Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Wikipedia, "Muhammad: The Messenger of God (film)"

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The crowd sourced encyclopedia's article on the film, read directly for this entry. Its strength is a well referenced summary of production credits, plot, the film's cinematographic approach to not depicting Muhammad, and the reception controversy, cross checked here against RFE/RL's contemporary reporting and against the Pak-Shiraz academic article's framing. Its limit is that it is not independently peer reviewed, so it is cited for corroborated factual detail rather than for interpretation.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Wikipedia's article on the film is a continuously revised, community edited tertiary encyclopedia entry with no named author or peer review process, hence the lower tier, though useful for its well referenced production and release record.
Notes
Read directly during research; cited for production credits, plot detail, cinematographic technique and the full reception and controversy record.
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad:_The_Messenger_of_God_(film)
Source Type
reference
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Muhammad, Figures

This source names Muhammad directly: "nematographic approach to not depicting Muhammad, and the reception controversy, cross c"

Source Wikipedia, "Muhammad: The Messenger of God (film)"Wikipedia contributors
Shiraz, Cities

This source names Shiraz directly: "reporting and against the Pak-Shiraz academic article's framing."

Source Wikipedia, "Muhammad: The Messenger of God (film)"Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (20 claims)

This source backs 20 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Screen Works, 9 claims: 5 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.