Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Watatsumi (Wikipedia)

Wikipedia, continuously updated

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Wikipedia's article on Watatsumi is a community edited reference page rather than a peer reviewed publication. It is reliable for a general overview of the sea deity's place in Japanese mythology, and less reliable for evaluating regional or sectarian variation in how the figure is understood. Use it for basic identification; a claim needing deeper scholarly grounding needs a dedicated study.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Wikipedia's article on Watatsumi, the Japanese sea deity, the lower tier reflecting that it is a crowd sourced, not independently peer reviewed encyclopedia entry, useful for a general overview rather than a substitute for a dedicated study of Japanese sea deity traditions.
Notes
Crowd-sourced tertiary reference. Used here only for the specific, checkable facts that the Nihon Shoki names three separate Watatsumi deities born at Izanagi's purification alongside the Sumiyoshi triad, and that Shikaumi Jinja on Shika Island is the head shrine of the Watatsumi shrine network and the ancestral shrine of the Azumi clan, who trace descent from Watatsumi through his son Utsushihikanasaku. 1
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors 1
Publisher
Wikipedia 1
Publication Year
2026 1
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watatsumi 1
Source Type
reference 1
Sources
Claims Backed By This Source (6 claims)

This source backs 6 claims across the atlas. As facts: 4 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 connected. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Articles, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.