Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings, With Selections From Traditional Commentaries

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Brook Ziporyn's Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings, With Selections From Traditional Commentaries, published by Hackett Publishing Company in 2009, is a scholarly critical translation of the classical Daoist text that also includes translated excerpts from its historical Chinese commentarial tradition. Its authority rests on Ziporyn's standing as a specialist translator and scholar of classical Chinese philosophy and on standard academic press review. Including the traditional commentaries alongside the text itself is a deliberate scholarly choice that helps a reader see how the text has actually been read within its own tradition, rather than through a single modern interpretive lens.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Brook Ziporyn's Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings, With Selections From Traditional Commentaries, published by Hackett Publishing Company in 2009, the top tier reflecting a scholarly critical translation by a specialist translator and scholar of classical Chinese philosophy, including translated excerpts from the text's historical Chinese commentarial tradition. Including the traditional commentaries is a deliberate scholarly choice that helps a reader see how the text has actually been read within its own tradition, rather than through a single modern interpretive lens.
Notes
Scholarly critical translation of the Zhuangzi with selections from traditional commentaries.
Citation
Author
Brook Ziporyn (translator and editor)
Publisher
Hackett Publishing Company
Publication Year
2009
Source Type
critical translation
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Zhuangzi, Figures

This source names Zhuangzi directly: "Brook Ziporyn's Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings, With Selections From Traditional Commentaries, published by Hackett Publishing Company in 2009, is a scholarly critical translation of the classical..."

Claims Backed By This Source (12 claims)

This source backs 12 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.