Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Subcategories

Jain Councils

3 of 61 entries in Councils and Synods. Click any to see everything it connects to.

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The councils at which the Jain monastic community has gathered to fix its canon and settle points of doctrine and discipline, including the councils that mark the historical split between the Digambara and Svetambara traditions. An entry records what was decided and by which branch it is accepted.

Facts
Directory
Category
Councils and Synods 1
Learn More
Three Councils That Fixed Two Different Scriptures

This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.

Jain Councils gathers three attempts to fix a canon that kept slipping away from the community that carried it, and the story they tell together is of a scripture the two great branches of Jainism now hold in entirely different forms, because they trust different councils.

The Jain Council of Pataliputra, traditionally held under Sthulabhadra about three centuries after Mahavira, tried to fix the canon after a famine had scattered the community and broken its memorised transmission. Svetambara tradition records that eleven of the twelve Angas were recovered and that the twelfth, the Drstivada, was not; Digambara tradition does not accept the recension at all, holding that the original canon was already lost, and the two communities have had different scriptures ever since. The Council of Mathura, held later at Mathura, recited and set in order a canon that had again grown scattered, under the elder Skandila; it is one of two recensions the Svetambara tradition remembers from the same period, and their relationship to each other has never been fully worked out.

The Council of Valabhi, held in Gujarat under Devarddhigani Kshamashramana, finally committed the Svetambara Agamas to writing after centuries of oral transmission, though Jain tradition itself gives two dates for it, 453 and 466 CE, sources never reconciled. That redaction produced the Svetambara canon in substantially the form it still holds today, and the Digambaras do not recognise it, so the same three councils that tried to rescue one scripture ended by fixing two.

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.