Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Textual Witnesses

Mar Saba Letter

Manuscript Leaves

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Two and a half pages of Greek copied in an eighteenth-century hand into the endpapers of a printed book, found at the monastery of Mar Saba in 1958 by Morton Smith. The text presents itself as a letter of Clement of Alexandria, and it quotes from what it calls a secret or fuller gospel of Mark, used at Alexandria and kept from the uninitiated. If genuine, it is evidence for a second-century Alexandrian tradition that no other source records. If not, it is one of the most accomplished forgeries in the history of the discipline. Serious scholars hold both positions and have argued them in print for fifty years, and the question cannot be settled by the ordinary means because the physical leaves have not been available for examination since 1983.

Facts
Disputed
Authenticated
Whether the letter is a genuine copy of a work of Clement of Alexandria or a modern forgery has been argued in print for over fifty years. Morton Smith, Scott G. Brown and Charles Hedrick have defended it; Stephen C. Carlson, Peter Jeffery and Francis Watson have argued it is a modern composition, in Carlson's case that Smith himself wrote it. 1
A genuine dispute with identifiable camps, arguing from the handwriting, the Greek style, the content and the circumstances of the find. Neither side has produced a decisive argument, and the usual physical tests have never been available to either.
Open Questions
Current Location
Where the leaves are now is not known. They were removed from their volume at the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate library in Jerusalem after the 1983 examination and have not been publicly produced since. 2
This is an absence rather than a disagreement: no one holds or defends a position about where the leaves are.
Structure
Structure
Two and a half pages of Greek in the endpapers of a 1646 printed edition of the letters of Ignatius, presenting themselves as a letter of Clement of Alexandria and quoting a longer version of the Gospel of Mark 1
Provenance
Discovered
Reported by Morton Smith to have been found in 1958 in the library of the Mar Saba monastery near Jerusalem, copied into the endpapers of a seventeenth century printed book. 2
Learn More
Two and a Half Pages in the Back of a Printed Book

In 1958 Morton Smith, an American scholar of ancient religion, was cataloguing the library of the monastery of Mar Saba in the Judaean desert. In the back of a printed edition of the letters of Ignatius, published in 1646, he found two and a half pages of Greek written in by hand in what looked like an eighteenth-century monastic script.

The text presents itself as a letter from Clement of Alexandria, writing near the end of the second century, to someone named Theodore. It addresses a group called the Carpocratians, who it says have got hold of a version of the Gospel of Mark and corrupted it. In the course of the argument the letter quotes that gospel, describing a longer or secret Mark used at Alexandria for those being initiated, and it gives two passages from it that appear in no other source. One describes Jesus raising a young man from a tomb, in language close to the raising of Lazarus in John, and the young man afterwards coming to him by night wearing a linen cloth.

Smith photographed the pages in black and white and published his study of them in 1973. What he had found, if it was what it appeared to be, was evidence of a second-century Alexandrian tradition attested nowhere else, and a version of a canonical gospel that had left no other trace.

Fifty Years of Argument About Something Nobody Can Examine

The dispute began almost at once and has not ended. On one side, Morton Smith himself, and later Scott G. Brown and Charles Hedrick, argued that the letter is a genuine copy of a lost work of Clement and that its Greek, its argument and its use of Clement's vocabulary are beyond the reach of a forger. On the other, Stephen C. Carlson, Peter Jeffery and Francis Watson have argued that it is a modern composition, and Carlson argued specifically that Smith wrote it himself, pointing to features of the handwriting he read as signs of a slow, drawn hand imitating a script rather than writing one.

That is a genuine disagreement between serious people, and the atlas records it as one. What makes it unusual is that it cannot be settled by the means that settle such questions elsewhere.

The volume moved to the library of the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate in Jerusalem in 1976. In 1983 a team examined it and took colour photographs, and at that point the leaves were removed from the book, reportedly for separate conservation. They have not been publicly produced since. No ink analysis has ever been done. No paper analysis. No forensic examination of the hand with the original in front of the examiner. Fifty years of argument, on both sides, rests entirely on photographs, and where the leaves are now is simply not known.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Housed At

Sources
1. Clement of Alexandria and a Secret Gospel of Mark
Morton Smith, Harvard University Press, 1973View the Source
2. Mark's Other Gospel: Rethinking Morton Smith's Controversial Discovery
Scott G. Brown, Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2005
The Gospel Hoax: Morton Smith's Invention of Secret Mark
Stephen C. Carlson, Baylor University Press, 2005
Open Questions (1 open question)
Where are the Mar Saba leaves, and would ink and paper analysis settle whether the letter is a modern forgery?

The leaves were removed from their printed volume at the library of the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate in Jerusalem after the examination of 1983 and have not been publicly produced since. Nobody has stated where they are. Every argument about the document, on both sides of a fifty-year dispute, therefore rests on two sets of photographs, one black and white from 1958 and one colour from 1983. No ink analysis, no paper analysis and no examination of the writing under magnification by a document examiner with the original in front of them has ever been carried out. This is not a case of scholars disagreeing about evidence; it is a case of the evidence being unavailable.

What would resolve this Locating the leaves within the Patriarchate library and permitting a standard document examination: ink composition, comparison of the ink against other eighteenth-century writing in the same collection, paper and pen analysis, and assessment of the hand by a forensic document examiner. Any of those would bear directly on whether the writing is of the eighteenth century or the twentieth, which is the question the whole dispute turns on.
Manuscript studies and Greek palaeography; forensic document examination and ink chemistry; and the cooperation of the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Jerusalem.Scott G. Brown, Mark's Other Gospel: Rethinking Morton Smith's Controversial Discovery
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.