Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Alphabet Letters

Big Yus Ⱘ

Glagolitic Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin Devised about 863 CE for the Moravian mission of Constantine the Philosopher, later Saint Cyril, and his brother Methodius

Big Yus is the fortieth letter of Glagolitic and writes the nasal back vowel, the second of the two nasals of Old Church Slavonic. Like the small yus it records a sound lost from nearly every later Slavic language, and the pair of them are among the surest markers of an early text. In Bulgarian the letter survived in the orthography, with a changed value, until the spelling reform of 1945. The two yuses together are the clearest illustration of what the Slavic alphabets had to do that a relabelled Greek series could not: supply signs for a vowel system Greek had no way to write. Its Cyrillic counterpart is still used in Bulgarian typography and heraldry as a mark of the older written tradition.

Facts
Open Questions
Origin of the Name
Not established for this letter's own name
Big Yus's own description discusses the lost nasal back vowel it records, not the origin of its name, and gives none. Covered by the already-live OpenQuestion on the opaque tail of Glagolitic letter names.
Sense of the Name
Not established for this letter's own name
Big Yus's own description gives no sense for its name at all. Covered by the already-live OpenQuestion on the opaque tail of Glagolitic letter names.
Attributions
Associated Sound
A nasal back vowel, the sound written by Slavists as a nasal o 1Tradition: The Glagolitic alphabet of Old Church Slavonic
Origins
Origin Period
Devised about 863 CE for the Moravian mission of Constantine the Philosopher, later Saint Cyril, and his brother Methodius 2
Place of Origin
Byzantium and Great Moravia; the letters were made in Constantinople or Thessalonica and carried north for the mission 2
Identity
Script Type
An alphabet: each letter writes a single sound, consonant or vowel, with no inherent vowel and no vowel diacritics 1
Position
The forty-first letter of the Glagolitic alphabet in the traditional order 1Tradition: The Glagolitic alphabet of Old Church Slavonic
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Big Yus survived in Bulgarian orthography, with a changed value, until the spelling reform of 1945, and its Cyrillic counterpart is still used today in Bulgarian typography and heraldry as a deliberate mark of the older written tradition. 1
Learn More
Big Yus: The Glagolitic Letter

Big yus writes the back nasal vowel, the second member of the pair of nasal vowels that Old Church Slavonic inherited, and it carries no numeral value.

The vowel it records was lost across almost all of the Slavic world. Where it stood, the modern languages have an ordinary oral vowel, arrived at by denasalisation at various dates in various places, and only Polish retains nasal vowels of its own. A word written with this letter in an early manuscript can therefore be traced to a nasal vowel in the parent language on the strength of the spelling alone, which is the sort of leverage that makes an early orthography worth studying in its own right.

The letter is common in the canon, because the vowel it wrote occurred in frequent endings, so its forms are well attested in both hands of the script.

Its name is opaque and the reference literature records it without an etymology. The atlas treats that, as it treats the rest of the names at this end of the alphabet, as a gap in the record rather than as an invitation to supply a reading, and it carries an open question stating what a study of the whole set would have to establish.

No number attaches to it in Glagolitic. The counted series in this script stops at the second letter for the vowel o, and everything after that, including both nasal vowels and all four nasal signs, stands outside the arithmetic. Cyrillic leaves the same letter unnumbered for its own reason, that Greek had nothing in the slot to inherit from.

Big Yus and the Loss of the Nasal Vowels

The disappearance of the nasal vowels is one of the largest changes in the history of Slavic, and the two yus letters are how it is tracked. Because they were written before the change and continued to be written for a time afterwards, the manuscripts record the process in progress rather than only its result.

The signs of that are visible in the way scribes used the letters. Early texts keep the two nasal vowels apart and keep both apart from the oral vowels they would eventually become. Later texts begin to confuse them, first in particular positions and then generally, and eventually a scribe writes a yus where the older orthography had an oral vowel, which shows the letter has become a spelling convention with no sound behind it. Each stage can be dated approximately and located approximately, and the pattern differs between regions.

That is why the yus letters are among the first things a Slavist looks at in an unplaced manuscript. They are a clock that was running while the books were being copied. The letter itself is not the change and does not cause it; it is a fixed point against which the change can be measured, which is what an old orthography always is once the language has moved past it.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Derived from This

Why this is disputed. The big yus writes the nasal back vowel, a sound Greek script had no sign for. Cyrillic paleographers broadly agree its shape was adapted from the Glagolitic sign for the same vowel, but do not agree on much beyond that: some trace the Glagolitic form itself back to a Greek ligature, others to an independent Slavic invention, so calling the Cyrillic sign derived from Glagolitic settles only the immediate step and not the letter's ultimate origin.

Originates in Language

Glagolitic was devised in the 860s so that Greek scripture and liturgy could be read in Slavonic, and Big Yus belongs to the alphabet of Old Church Slavonic, the language of that translation and of the earliest Slavonic books.

Related To

Cyrillic Big Yus writes the same sound and stands in the same place in the Slavonic alphabet. Neither script numbers the letter. Which of the two Slavonic scripts came first, and how much either owes the other, is argued rather than settled.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)

Big Yus answers to Glagolitic Big Yus: the same nasal back vowel and the same place in the Slavonic alphabet. Neither script numbers the letter.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Sources
1. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996on the Slavic alphabets, their letters and their numeral systemsView the Source
2. Byzantine Missions Among the Slavs: SS. Constantine-Cyril and Methodius
Francis Dvornik, Rutgers University Press, 1970on the Moravian mission and the making of the Slavic lettersView the Source
The Unicode Standard
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode Consortiumon the encoded characters, their names and their block assignmentView the Source
Open Questions (1 open question)
Did the opaque Glagolitic letter names, fritu, heru, tsi and sha among them, ever carry a sense in Slavonic?

The first twenty letter names of Glagolitic are ordinary Slavonic words and read together as connected sentences, from azu buky vede, I know letters, through ritsi slovo tvrido, say the word firmly. From fritu onwards the names stop meaning anything recoverable, and the reference literature records them as of uncertain or unknown origin without offering a reading. This is an absence rather than a disagreement: no camps hold rival etymologies for these names, and no investigation has settled whether they are corrupted Slavonic words, reflexes of Greek letter names, or labels that never carried a sense. The same gap stands over the corresponding Cyrillic names, which are the same names.

What would resolve this A systematic etymological study of the full set of Slavic letter names, working from the earliest abecedaria and from the acrostic alphabet poems of the Old Church Slavonic tradition, which arrange the names in verse and may preserve senses the plain lists do not. A demonstration that the names never carried a sense would close the question as firmly as a set of etymologies would.
Slavic historical linguistics; Old Church Slavonic philologyPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), The World's Writing Systems
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.