Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Alphabet Letters

Brahmi Ga 𑀕

Brahmi Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin Mature Brahmi is securely attested in the edicts of Ashoka in the middle of the third century BCE, and the script could be read again only after James Prinsep worked out its values in 1837

Ga is the voiced unaspirated velar stop, made at the same place as ka with the vocal folds vibrating through the closure. In the five by five table of the Indian phoneticians it is the third member of the velar class, after the voiceless pair and before the voiced aspirate, an order that runs voiceless, voiceless aspirate, voiced, voiced aspirate, nasal in every one of the five groups without exception. That regularity is what makes the table teachable, and it is preserved unchanged in the Brahmi order and in every alphabet that descends from Brahmi, north and south alike. The Indian analysis of voice and aspiration as two independent features anticipates by a long way the terms modern phonetics uses for the same sounds, which is part of why the table still teaches well.

Facts
Disputed
Origin Period
Many epigraphists derive Brahmi from a Semitic prototype, most often Aramaic, adapted in the centuries before the Mauryan empire 2Tradition: Indian epigraphy
Brahmi's ancestry is disputed among epigraphists. Richard Salomon's Indian Epigraphy (Oxford University Press, 1998) surveys two live positions on the origin of the script attested in the Ashokan inscriptions: one derives Brahmi from a Semitic prototype, most often Aramaic, adapted in the centuries before the Mauryan empire; the other holds that it developed inside India itself. The dispute turns on the corpus, since Brahmi is securely attested only from Ashoka's edicts in the middle of the third century BCE onward, first read again by James Prinsep in 1837, and no earlier specimen on either side is securely dated. Both camps compare Brahmi's letterforms against Aramaic and other Semitic scripts using the same paleographic method, and without an intermediate dated example bridging the gap between any proposed ancestor and the Mauryan era script, neither derivation has been shown to fit the evidence better than the other.
Origin Period
Others argue for a development inside India, and with no securely dated specimen earlier than the edicts the question stays open 2Tradition: Indian epigraphy
Brahmi's ancestry is disputed among epigraphists. Richard Salomon's Indian Epigraphy (Oxford University Press, 1998) surveys two live positions on the origin of the script attested in the Ashokan inscriptions: one derives Brahmi from a Semitic prototype, most often Aramaic, adapted in the centuries before the Mauryan empire; the other holds that it developed inside India itself. The dispute turns on the corpus, since Brahmi is securely attested only from Ashoka's edicts in the middle of the third century BCE onward, first read again by James Prinsep in 1837, and no earlier specimen on either side is securely dated. Both camps compare Brahmi's letterforms against Aramaic and other Semitic scripts using the same paleographic method, and without an intermediate dated example bridging the gap between any proposed ancestor and the Mauryan era script, neither derivation has been shown to fit the evidence better than the other.
Origins
Origin Period
Mature Brahmi is securely attested in the edicts of Ashoka in the middle of the third century BCE, and the script could be read again only after James Prinsep worked out its values in 1837 2Tradition: Indian epigraphy
Place of Origin
The Indian subcontinent. The Ashokan edicts carry the script from the Gangetic plain across the Deccan to the far south, while the northwest of the same empire wrote in Kharosthi instead 2Tradition: Indian epigraphy
Origin of the Name
The letter has no traditional name of its own. It is called by its own sound plus the inherent short a, and the form used here is the name the Unicode Standard gives the character 3Tradition: Modern scholarly naming of the Brahmi letters
Sense of the Name
the voiced unaspirated velar; third consonant of the Brahmi order 3Tradition: Modern scholarly naming of the Brahmi letters
Transmission
Manuscript Tradition
Attested from the Asokan rock and pillar edicts of the third century BCE, the earliest substantial Brahmi corpus. 2
Identity
Script Type
An abugida: every consonant sign carries an inherent short a, which a vowel mark alters and the virama cancels, so the unit written is the syllable rather than the single sound 1Tradition: Comparative writing systems
Position
Third consonant of the Brahmi order and third member of the velar class 2Tradition: Indian epigraphy
How the Letter Joins
Consonants that meet with no vowel between them are written as a conjunct, the second stacked beneath or ligatured to the first, rather than as two separate signs 1Tradition: Comparative writing systems
Attributions
Associated Sound
Voiced unaspirated velar stop, made at the same place as ka with the vocal folds vibrating through the closure 2Tradition: Indian epigraphy
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
The letter belongs to the received Brahmi order, and the corresponding sign in the scripts descended from Brahmi across South and Southeast Asia goes back to it 2Tradition: Indian epigraphy
Learn More
Ga in the Vocabulary of Going

One of the most productive roots in Sanskrit begins with this letter, the root meaning to go, and its derivatives run through the language. Used as the final member of a compound it forms adjectives meaning going in, moving through or situated in, so a great many descriptive terms in the religious and technical vocabulary of the subcontinent end in this consonant. The same root supplies the ordinary verb of motion, the noun for a going or a course, and a set of derived stems whose meanings have travelled a long way from movement.

In the writing the letter behaves as every consonant does. It carries the inherent short a, takes a vowel mark when a different vowel follows, and joins a following consonant into a single conjunct where no vowel comes between. Its clusters with the semivowels and with the class nasal are frequent, and in a script that stacks the second element of a cluster beneath the first, a common letter accumulates a large set of standard combined shapes that a reader learns as units rather than assembling each time. Several of the descendant scripts later added a subscript dot to this letter to write the voiced velar fricative of Persian and Arabic loanwords, one of a small family of dotted letters that extended the inherited inventory without disturbing its order.

A Shape That Held Its Form

This is one of the letters a palaeographer is glad to have. It is frequent enough in every period to give plenty of examples, and its Brahmi form is distinct enough from its neighbours that a worn specimen can usually still be told apart from them, which is not true everywhere in the script. Dating an undated inscription in India is done by comparing the shapes of common letters against inscriptions whose date is known from a named ruler or a regnal year, and the method depends entirely on having letters that are both common and unambiguous.

The letter is well attested in the Ashokan edicts and in the donative records of the following centuries at Sanchi, Bharhut and the western cave sites, and it can be followed through the Kushana and Gupta hands into both the northern and the southern branches of the family. That two-branch split is the main structural fact of Indian palaeography after the Mauryan period: the northern line runs through the Gupta script and Siddham towards Nagari, Sharada and the scripts of the Himalayan region, while the southern line produces the Grantha, Tamil, Kannada, Telugu and Sinhala alphabets and, by way of the Pallava chancery script, most of the writing systems of mainland and island Southeast Asia.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Derived from This

Devanagari Ga descends from the Brahmi sign of the same value, through the Gupta and Nagari hands of northern India. The two alphabets align letter for letter because both are laid out in the varnamala order, the arrangement the Sanskrit phoneticians fixed by place of articulation.

The Gurmukhi letter Gagga continues the sign Brahmi Ga writes in the same place of the inherited series. The descent is not direct: it runs through the Sharada script of the northwest and then the Landa hands of the Punjab, and it is stated from position in the order rather than from shape.

Ranjana Ga continues the sign Brahmi Ga writes in the same place of the inherited varnamala. The descent is not direct: it runs through the Gupta and Siddhamatrka stages of the northern Brahmi line and then the scripts of Nepal, and it is stated from position in the order rather than from shape.

Siddham continues the Brahmi order letter for letter. The descent runs through the late Brahmi of the Gupta period and the Siddhamatrka hand that grows out of it, so this is a lineage rather than a direct copy of the older shape.

Tibetan ga continues the Brahmi ga, keeping its value and its place in the inherited order. The descent of the Tibetan script from the Brahmi family is not disputed; which Indic script of that family served as the immediate model in the seventh century is, and this link names the ancestor the atlas holds rather than choosing among the candidates.

Related To

Aspiration partners in the velar class. Both are voiced, and the second is released with the breathy voice that Sanskrit kept where most of its relatives lost it.

Voicing partners in the velar class. Both are unaspirated stops made with the back of the tongue against the soft palate, and the vocal folds vibrate through the closure of the second.

Opposite corners of the velar class, the first of the five groups of five. Between them the two carry one feature each from the pair the table is built on.

The nasal of the velar class. Both are voiced and both are made with the back of the tongue against the soft palate, the nasal differing in that the closure is released through the nose.

Ga answers to Brahmi Ga, the same voiced velar stop.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Sources
1. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996View the Source
2. Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the Other Indo-Aryan Languages
Richard Salomon, Oxford University Press, 1998View the Source
3. The Unicode Standard
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode ConsortiumView the Source
Sanskrit Grammar, Including Both the Classical Language and the Older Dialects of Veda and Brahmana
William Dwight Whitney, Breitkopf and Hartel, 1889View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.