Alphabet Letters
Final Nun ן
final NOON
Also Known As Final Nun
Hebrew Letters
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin Develops the Achaemenid Aramaic chancery hand, adopted after the exile
Final Nun is the word-final (sofit) form of the letter Nun, written with a long straight descending stroke and used whenever Nun falls at the end of a word. In the standard gematria of the final letters it carries the extended value of seven hundred. It shares the meaning of its parent letter, fish, and the same Hermetic attributions: the sign Scorpio, the tarot trump Death, and the twenty-fourth path of the Tree of Life. Its tall extended form suggests continuity and the life that runs on beneath the surface, and the five final forms together carry the hundreds from five hundred to nine hundred in gematria.
Facts
Disputed
Origin PeriodScholem places Sefer Yetzirah between the second and sixth century CE 4Tradition: Sefer Yetzirah: the thirty-two paths and the twenty-two letters Gershom Scholem's Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism (Schocken Books, New York, 1961) surveys the manuscript recensions of Sefer Yetzirah and finds no single stable text: the surviving copies diverge enough in wording and in the letter-to-planet and letter-to-sign correspondences that quoting "the text" requires naming which recension is meant. Comparing the linguistic style, the doctrinal content and the external references made to the work across centuries of citation, Scholem argues the book could have been composed anywhere from the second to the ninth century CE, a span of roughly a millennium, with later Kabbalistic and Hasidic writers each reading it through their own era's overlay. The atlas follows Scholem's range rather than a narrower guess, and does not print the per-letter planet and sign tables at all, because doing so would silently pick one contested recension over the others. Origin PeriodSurvives in three recensions that do not agree in detail 4Tradition: Sefer Yetzirah: the thirty-two paths and the twenty-two letters Gershom Scholem's Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism (Schocken Books, New York, 1961) surveys the manuscript recensions of Sefer Yetzirah and finds no single stable text: the surviving copies diverge enough in wording and in the letter-to-planet and letter-to-sign correspondences that quoting "the text" requires naming which recension is meant. Comparing the linguistic style, the doctrinal content and the external references made to the work across centuries of citation, Scholem argues the book could have been composed anywhere from the second to the ninth century CE, a span of roughly a millennium, with later Kabbalistic and Hasidic writers each reading it through their own era's overlay. The atlas follows Scholem's range rather than a narrower guess, and does not print the per-letter planet and sign tables at all, because doing so would silently pick one contested recension over the others. Attributions
Associated SoundSame sound as its parent letter Nun, the alveolar nasal n 1 Origins
Origin PeriodDevelops the Achaemenid Aramaic chancery hand, adopted after the exile 1Tradition: The Hebrew square script Origin PeriodNot the script of the earliest Hebrew inscriptions 1Tradition: The Hebrew square script Origin PeriodStandard by the Hasmonean period; palaeo-Hebrew survives only on coins 1Tradition: The Hebrew square script Place of OriginThe Levant, by way of the Aramaic administrative script of the Persian empire. 1Tradition: The Hebrew square script Origin of the NameNames travelled into Greek unchanged and meaningless 1Tradition: The Hebrew square script Origin of the NameNorthwest Semitic words inherited from the older linear script 1Tradition: The Hebrew square script Origin of the NamePictographic meanings (ox head, house, water) are modern reconstructions 1Tradition: The Hebrew square script Sense of the Namefish 1Tradition: The Hebrew square script The pictographic sense is a modern reconstruction from the letter name rather than a meaning attested in the script's own period, and the atlas records that position elsewhere on this letter. The name itself is inherited; the picture behind it is inferred. Identity
Script TypeAn abjad: the twenty-two letters of the Hebrew square script record consonants, read right to left, with vowels supplied either by the reading tradition or, in pointed texts, by the Masoretic vowel-pointing system. 1 PositionThird of the five Hebrew sofit final forms, the word-final form of Nun (fourteenth of twenty-two), extending the gematria series to seven hundred 1 Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceSays nothing of the five word-final forms; not separate letters 2Tradition: Sefer Yetzirah: the thirty-two paths and the twenty-two letters Meaning in the Attesting SourceSefer Yetzirah knows twenty-two letters: mothers, doubles, simples 2Tradition: Sefer Yetzirah: the thirty-two paths and the twenty-two letters Meaning in the Attesting SourceThis class is inherited from its base letter, not the text's own assignment 2Tradition: Sefer Yetzirah: the thirty-two paths and the twenty-two letters Rival Systems
A Rival System's AttributionMost gematria claims use the standard value, not mispar gadol 3Tradition: Standard Hebrew gematria (mispar hechrachi) A Rival System's AttributionStandard value (mispar hechrachi): 50, same as its base letter 3Tradition: Standard Hebrew gematria (mispar hechrachi) A Rival System's AttributionThis atlas records 700, the mispar gadol extended reckoning 3Tradition: Standard Hebrew gematria (mispar hechrachi) Learn More
Final Nun: The Final Form of Nun (Value 700)
Final Nun (nun sofit) is the word-final form of the simple letter Nun, extending in a long straight descender below the line where the medial nun is short. In standard gematria it equals Nun (50); in the extended mispar gadol reckoning it takes the value 700. As a variant of Nun it inherits that letter's Sefer Yetzirah sign (Scorpio in the classical scheme, and the trump Death in the later Golden Dawn overlay) rather than an independent one. The five final forms are a detail the Sefer Yetzirah itself is silent on: the text as it survives knows twenty-two letters, three mothers, seven doubles and twelve simples, and says nothing about separate word-final shapes, so Final Nun's classification is inherited wholesale from Nun rather than being the text's own assignment. That base text is itself hard to date: Gershom Scholem placed its composition somewhere between the second and sixth century CE, and it survives in three recensions that disagree with each other in detail.
The Hebrew script carrying these letterforms is not the script of the earliest Hebrew inscriptions either; it develops the Aramaic chancery hand of the Achaemenid Persian empire, adopted after the Babylonian exile and standard by the Hasmonean period, displacing the older palaeo-Hebrew script, which survives afterward mainly on coins. The letter names are Northwest Semitic words inherited from that older script; their familiar pictographic glosses are modern reconstructions, and the names travelled into Greek unchanged in sound but empty of meaning.
Final Nun: An Older Shape Preserved
Final Nun shares in the same Talmudic debate, recorded at Shabbat 104a, over whether the five sofit letters were fixed by the early prophets or only later confirmed by the men of the Great Assembly, a question the text leaves unresolved. Paleographers studying the wider history of the Aramaic-derived square script, the ancestor of the Hebrew alphabet discussed elsewhere in this atlas, have noted a separate, more general pattern behind why final forms exist at all: cursive handwriting tends to simplify and reshape a letter under the pressure of joining it smoothly to the letters before and after it, a pressure that does not apply to a letter sitting alone at the end of a word, so a word-final letter can preserve an older, less simplified shape even while its medial counterpart drifts further from that common ancestor over time.
Final Nun's own shape, a plain, unhooked vertical stroke descending below the line, fits that pattern: it is visually simpler than the medial Nun's small hooked head, and some paleographers read it as sitting closer to the letter's ancient, unadorned form than the busier medial shape most Hebrew readers see far more often. In the extended gematria system known as mispar gadol, discussed elsewhere in this atlas, Final Nun carries the value 700, part of the same extended sequence that gives the other four sofit letters values beyond 400.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Related To
The word-final form of Nun rather than a separate letter. Hebrew writes five of its consonants differently at the end of a word, and the two shapes stand for one and the same letter. The value 700 recorded here is the extended mispar gadol reckoning; in standard gematria the final form counts 50, exactly as Nun does.
Sources
1. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996the chapter on the Aramaic scriptView the Source 2. Sepher Yetzirah (Book of Formation)
Anonymous (traditionally attributed to Abraham)On the letter Nun in the Sefer YetzirahView the Source 3. Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras Wrought
Underwood Dudley, Mathematical Association of America (Spectrum series), 1997the chapter on alphabets for gematriaView the Source 4. Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism
Gershom Scholem, Schocken Books, 1961the chapter on early Jewish mysticism, on Sefer YetzirahView the Source Sefer Yetzirah: The Book of Creation in Theory and Practice
Aryeh Kaplan, Samuel Weiser, 1997On the Hebrew letters and gematriaView the Source Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.