Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Alphabet Letters

Tibetan Greng Bu ◌ེ

Tibetan Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin Devised in the seventh century CE, in the reign of Songtsen Gampo, on the model of an Indian Brahmi-derived script

Greng bu, written 'greng bu in transliteration with the a chung at its head, is the third of the four Tibetan vowel signs and writes the vowel e. It sits above the consonant it modifies, as gi gu and na ro do, and replaces that consonant's inherent a. The name is read in the grammatical tradition as the upright or standing one, from the verb 'greng ba, to stand. A doubled form of the sign writes the long e used in transcribing Sanskrit, a device Tibetan needs only for foreign words because its own language has no distinctive vowel length. Shown alone, the sign is displayed on a dotted circle.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
Devised in the seventh century CE, in the reign of Songtsen Gampo, on the model of an Indian Brahmi-derived script 3Tradition: The Tibetan imperial period
Place of Origin
Tibet, at the imperial court of Songtsen Gampo, modeled on an Indian Brahmi-derived script encountered through contact with India 3
Origin of the Name
Built on the verb 'greng ba, to stand, already recorded as this sign's own sense; a genuine descriptive Tibetan phrase rather than a name that is merely its own sound. 2
Sense of the Name
Read in the grammatical tradition as the upright or standing one, from the verb 'greng ba, to stand 2Tradition: Tibetan grammatical tradition
Identity
Script Type
A dependent vowel sign, not an independent letter; it is written above or below the consonant it modifies and replaces that consonant's inherent a 1Tradition: Brahmic writing
Position
Third of the four vowel signs, the dbyangs 2Tradition: The Tibetan alphabet
How the Letter Joins
A dependent vowel sign written above the consonant it modifies; a doubled form writes long e for Sanskrit 2Tradition: Tibetan orthography
Attributions
Associated Sound
The vowel e, replacing the inherent a of the consonant it is written above 2Tradition: Classical Tibetan and modern Lhasa pronunciation
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
A doubled form of greng bu writes the long e used in transcribing Sanskrit, a device Tibetan needs only for foreign words since its own language has no distinctive vowel length. 2
Learn More
Greng Bu: The Vowel Sign E

Greng bu is the third of the four Tibetan vowel signs and writes the vowel e. It sits above the consonant it modifies, as gi gu and na ro do, and replaces that consonant inherent a, so ka with greng bu upon it is read ke.

The name is read in the grammatical tradition as the upright or standing one, from a verb meaning to stand, which describes the shape of the mark. That is a transparent gloss and the tradition offers it consistently, which is not the case for all four names.

Like the other signs it is dependent and cannot stand alone. Where a syllable begins with e the sign is written on a chen, the thirtieth consonant, and shown by itself it is displayed on a dotted circle.

Tibetan does not distinguish vowel length in its own vocabulary, so there is no long e to write and no sign for one. What exists instead is a device for foreign words, taken up in the article beside this one.

Greng bu is recited third of the four, after gi gu and zhabs kyu and before na ro, and the same sequence is used when Tibetan words are sorted, so the position of a sign in the recitation is also its position in a dictionary.

As with every Tibetan vowel, the sound produced for a syllable containing greng bu depends on what follows it. A suffix reshapes the vowel in front of it, so the value of the sign is settled only when the end of the syllable has been reached, and the sign on its own does not tell a reader what will be heard.

The Doubled Signs and the Long Vowels of Sanskrit

Sanskrit distinguishes long vowels from short ones and the distinction is meaningful, so a Tibetan translator writing a Sanskrit name or a mantra could not simply ignore it. Tibetan has no vowel length of its own and its four signs make no provision for one.

The solution was to extend the signs rather than to invent new ones. A doubled vowel sign writes the long vowel: two greng bu for a long e, two na ro for a long o, and the same principle for i and u. For the long a, which has no sign of its own to double because a is the inherent vowel, the small a is subjoined beneath the letter instead.

This belongs to the same body of machinery as the reversed letters and the subjoined ha: a set of devices built beside the alphabet so that Sanskrit could be written exactly, without disturbing the thirty letters and four signs that a Tibetan child recites. All of it is taught after the alphabet and to a narrower group, and a reader of ordinary Tibetan may never need any of it.

The general shape of the solution is characteristic of the script. Where something new is needed, an existing element is modified, doubled, reversed or subjoined. Nothing is imported whole.

None of it changed the recitation. A Tibetan child still learns four vowel signs and thirty letters, and the long forms are taught later, with the rest of the transcription apparatus, to those who will have to read Sanskrit.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Derived From

Tibetan greng bu continues the Brahmi e, keeping its value and its place in the inherited order. The descent of the Tibetan script from the Brahmi family is not disputed; which Indic script of that family served as the immediate model in the seventh century is, and this link names the ancestor the atlas holds rather than choosing among the candidates.

Related To

Greng bu, the vowel sign for e, answers to Brahmi E, the independent vowel letter for the same sound in the ancestor script.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Sources
1. The Unicode Standard
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode ConsortiumView the Source
2. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996View the Source
3. Tibet: A History
Sam van Schaik, Yale University Press, 2011View the Source
Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the Other Indo-Aryan Languages
Richard Salomon, Oxford University Press, 1998View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.