Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Alphabet Letters

Tibetan Kha ཁ

Tibetan Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin Devised in the seventh century CE, in the reign of Songtsen Gampo, on the model of an Indian Brahmi-derived script

Kha is the second of the thirty consonants and the aspirated partner of ka: the same closure at the soft palate, released with an audible breath. Tibetan orders its consonants in the Indian manner, unaspirated then aspirated then voiced then nasal, so kha stands second in a line running ka kha ga nga, and that same shape repeats through the palatal, dental and labial lines that follow. In modern Lhasa speech ka and kha have fallen together as an aspirated k carrying high tone, so the distinction the alphabet preserves is now one of spelling and of the older language rather than of present pronunciation. Kha takes the ya, ra and wa subscripts and never appears as a prefix, a suffix or a superscript.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
Devised in the seventh century CE, in the reign of Songtsen Gampo, on the model of an Indian Brahmi-derived script 3Tradition: The Tibetan imperial period
Place of Origin
Tibet, at the imperial court of Songtsen Gampo, modeled on an Indian Brahmi-derived script encountered through contact with India 3
Origin of the Name
The letter has no name beyond its own sound, unlike the Semitic alphabets where each letter is named for a word, matching the already-live convention on Ka (856), the first of the thirty. 2
Sense of the Name
The syllable kha itself, the aspirated partner of ka, the same velar closure released with an audible breath. 2
Identity
Script Type
Consonant sign of an abugida; it carries the inherent vowel a unless a vowel sign is written above or below it 1Tradition: Brahmic writing
Position
Second of the thirty consonants, and the aspirated member of the velar line 2Tradition: The Tibetan alphabet
How the Letter Joins
A root letter only: it never serves as a prefix, a suffix, a superscript or a subscript 2Tradition: Tibetan orthography
Attributions
Associated Sound
Voiceless aspirated velar stop; merged with ka as an aspirated k with high tone in modern Lhasa speech 2Tradition: Classical Tibetan and modern Lhasa pronunciation
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
In modern Lhasa speech ka and kha have fallen together as an aspirated k carrying high tone, so the distinction the alphabet preserves is now one of spelling and of the older language rather than of present pronunciation. 2
Learn More
Kha and the Aspirated Series

Kha is the second of the thirty consonants and the aspirated partner of ka: the same closure at the soft palate, released with a breath the ear can hear. It takes the ya, ra and wa subscripts, and like ka it plays no part in the prefix, suffix or superscript systems.

The pairing is not local to the velar line. Tibetan inherited from the Indian ordering of sounds a grid in which each line of stops runs unaspirated, aspirated, voiced, nasal, and that shape repeats through the palatals, the dentals, the labials and the affricates. Kha stands in the second column, and so do cha, tha, pha and tsha directly beneath it. A learner who grasps the column has grasped five letters rather than one, which is why the alphabet is taught as a recitation with a rhythm rather than as a list to be memorised item by item.

Aspiration was a genuine contrast in the classical language and it remains one in the modern language, but it no longer works alone. In Lhasa speech the old unaspirated ka and the aspirated kha have fallen together as an aspirated k, and both carry high tone. The distinction the second column preserves is now a fact of spelling and of the older language rather than a difference a Lhasa speaker produces. Other dialects, particularly in Amdo, keep more of the older system, so what has merged depends on where the speaker is from.

Reading Wylie: The H That Is Not a Fricative

Almost every Tibetan word an English reader meets in print arrives through a transliteration rather than in Tibetan letters, and the commonest of these systems is the Wylie transliteration, standard in scholarly writing since the late nineteen fifties. It is designed to be reversible: every Tibetan letter has exactly one roman equivalent, so a Wylie string can be turned back into Tibetan writing without loss and without guesswork.

That design has a cost, and kha is where the cost is clearest. The h in kha marks aspiration on the preceding letter. It is not a separate sound, it is not the h of hat, and the sequence is not a fricative. The same convention accounts for cha, tha, pha and tsha, none of which is the digraph an English eye expects: tha is a t released with a breath and has nothing to do with the th of thin, and pha is a p and never an f.

Because Wylie is a transliteration rather than a pronunciation guide, it also declines to tell a reader what a word sounds like. Silent prefixes, silent superscripts and silent suffixes are all written out, so a syllable spelled bsgrubs in Wylie carries six roman letters for a spoken syllable of two or three sounds. Phonetic renderings exist alongside it and are used in journalism and on signage, but they lose the spelling and cannot be reversed. The atlas follows the transliterated forms, because the letters are the subject.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Derived From

Tibetan kha continues the Brahmi kha, keeping its value and its place in the inherited order. The descent of the Tibetan script from the Brahmi family is not disputed; which Indic script of that family served as the immediate model in the seventh century is, and this link names the ancestor the atlas holds rather than choosing among the candidates.

Related To

Kha answers to Brahmi Kha, the same aspirated velar stop, the second member of the velar line in both scripts.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Sources
1. The Unicode Standard
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode ConsortiumView the Source
2. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996View the Source
3. Tibet: A History
Sam van Schaik, Yale University Press, 2011View the Source
Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the Other Indo-Aryan Languages
Richard Salomon, Oxford University Press, 1998View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.