Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Alphabet Letters

Tibetan Nga ང

Tibetan Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin Devised in the seventh century CE, in the reign of Songtsen Gampo, on the model of an Indian Brahmi-derived script

Nga is the fourth of the thirty consonants and the nasal that closes the velar line. It writes the sound English spells ng in sing, and unlike English, Tibetan allows it to begin a word: nga is the ordinary word for I. Its place in the alphabet follows the Indian scheme exactly, where each of the first lines ends in the nasal formed at the same point in the mouth as the stops before it, so the reciter moves through the whole set of stops and then closes on their nasal. Nga is one of the ten suffixes and ends a great many syllables, but it is not among the five prefixes. As an initial it carries low tone in modern Lhasa speech, the residue of the voicing it held in the classical language.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
Devised in the seventh century CE, in the reign of Songtsen Gampo, on the model of an Indian Brahmi-derived script 3Tradition: The Tibetan imperial period
Place of Origin
Tibet, at the imperial court of Songtsen Gampo, modeled on an Indian Brahmi-derived script encountered through contact with India 3
Origin of the Name
The letter has no name beyond its own sound, unlike the Semitic alphabets where each letter is named for a word, matching the already-live convention on Ka (856), the first of the thirty. 2
Sense of the Name
The syllable nga itself, the nasal that closes the velar line. 2
Identity
Script Type
Consonant sign of an abugida; it carries the inherent vowel a unless a vowel sign is written above or below it 1Tradition: Brahmic writing
Position
Fourth of the thirty consonants, and the nasal closing the velar line 2Tradition: The Tibetan alphabet
How the Letter Joins
One of the ten suffixes, as well as a root letter; not one of the five prefixes 2Tradition: Tibetan orthography
Attributions
Associated Sound
Velar nasal, and unlike English it may begin a word; low tone as an initial in modern Lhasa speech 2Tradition: Classical Tibetan and modern Lhasa pronunciation
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Nga is the ordinary Tibetan word for I, one of the few letters whose name doubles as common vocabulary rather than standing only for a sound. 2
Learn More
Nga and the Nasal That Can Open a Word

Nga is the fourth of the thirty consonants and the nasal that closes the velar line. It writes the sound English spells ng in sing, and unlike English it is free to begin a word: nga is the ordinary Tibetan for I, and a speaker uses it constantly.

Its position follows the inherited Indian arrangement exactly. Each of the first lines runs through its stops and then closes on the nasal formed at the same point in the mouth, so a reciter passes from ka to kha to ga and lands on nga, the velar nasal, before moving forward to the palatals. The pattern is the reason the recitation is memorable: the mouth works from the back to the front in four steps and repeats the same manner sequence at each stop.

Nga is one of the ten suffixes and closes a very large number of Tibetan syllables. It is not among the five prefixes, so unlike ga and da it does its extra work only at the end of a syllable and never at the beginning. As an initial it carries low tone in modern Lhasa speech, in company with the other nasals and with the letters that were voiced in the classical language.

For an English reader the letter is a small correction to an assumption. The sound is not a cluster of n and g, and it is not confined to the middle and end of words; it is a single consonant that Tibetan treats as fully as usable at the front of a word as any other.

The Ten Suffixes and the Shape of a Syllable

A Tibetan syllable is a stack, and the stack has slots. Reading the writing means knowing which slot each letter is sitting in, and the slot after the root is the suffix, the rjes jug.

Ten of the thirty letters may take that position: ga, nga, da, na, ba, ma, the small a, ra, la and sa. Two of those ten, da in the classical language and sa still, may be followed by a further letter in a second suffix slot. Everything else is barred from the end of a syllable, so a reader who sees a letter after the root already knows it belongs to a set of ten and can rule out the other twenty at once.

The suffix does far more than close the syllable. In the modern language it reshapes the vowel in front of it, so that the same written vowel is heard differently depending on what follows, and a syllable therefore cannot be read letter by letter from left to right and assembled at the end. It also carries grammar: many of the case particles and verb endings of written Tibetan are suffixes or begin with one.

Between one syllable and the next stands the tsheg, a small raised dot. It is not a space and it is not a hyphen; it marks where one stack ends and the next begins, and without it the string of letters would be unreadable, because Tibetan does not otherwise separate its words.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Derived From

Tibetan nga continues the Brahmi nga, keeping its value and its place in the inherited order. The descent of the Tibetan script from the Brahmi family is not disputed; which Indic script of that family served as the immediate model in the seventh century is, and this link names the ancestor the atlas holds rather than choosing among the candidates.

Related To

Nga answers to Brahmi Nga, the nasal that closes the velar line in both scripts; Tibetan drops the intervening voiced aspirate Gha, per its own description of the palatal line's identical pruning.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Sources
1. The Unicode Standard
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode ConsortiumView the Source
2. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996View the Source
3. Tibet: A History
Sam van Schaik, Yale University Press, 2011View the Source
Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the Other Indo-Aryan Languages
Richard Salomon, Oxford University Press, 1998View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.