Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Alphabet Letters

Tibetan Sa ས

Tibetan Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin Devised in the seventh century CE, in the reign of Songtsen Gampo, on the model of an Indian Brahmi-derived script

Sa is the twenty-eighth of the thirty consonants and closes the seventh line. It writes a voiceless alveolar fricative, the s of English see, and it is the third of the three superscripts, one of the ten suffixes, and the second suffix that may follow another final. In that last role it is one of the marks of the genitive and of several other grammatical endings, so a syllable ending in two consonants in Tibetan writing is very often ending in a grammatical s. As a superscript, the sa mgo, it is silent in modern Lhasa speech and its former presence is carried by the tone of the syllable beneath it.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
Devised in the seventh century CE, in the reign of Songtsen Gampo, on the model of an Indian Brahmi-derived script 3Tradition: The Tibetan imperial period
Place of Origin
Tibet, at the imperial court of Songtsen Gampo, modeled on an Indian Brahmi-derived script encountered through contact with India 3
Origin of the Name
The letter has no name beyond its own sound, unlike the Semitic alphabets where each letter is named for a word, matching the already-live convention on Ka (856), the first of the thirty. 2
Sense of the Name
The syllable sa itself, the voiceless alveolar fricative that closes the seventh line. 2
Identity
Script Type
Consonant sign of an abugida; it carries the inherent vowel a unless a vowel sign is written above or below it 1Tradition: Brahmic writing
Position
Twenty-eighth of the thirty consonants, closing the seventh line 2Tradition: The Tibetan alphabet
How the Letter Joins
One of the three superscripts, one of the ten suffixes, and a second suffix following another final 2Tradition: Tibetan orthography
Attributions
Associated Sound
Voiceless alveolar fricative, the s of see; silent as a superscript in modern Lhasa speech 2Tradition: Classical Tibetan and modern Lhasa pronunciation
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
As the second suffix that may follow another final, sa is one of the marks of the genitive and of several other grammatical endings, so a syllable ending in two consonants in Tibetan writing is very often ending in a grammatical s. 2
Learn More
Sa: Superscript, Suffix and Second Suffix

Sa is the twenty-eighth of the thirty consonants and closes the seventh line. It writes a voiceless alveolar fricative, the s of English see, and it carries high tone as an initial in modern Lhasa speech.

Like ra and la it is one of the busiest letters in the script. It is one of the three superscripts, one of the ten suffixes, and, uniquely with the classical da, one of the two letters that may stand in the second suffix slot after another final consonant. Only ra matches it for the number of positions it can occupy.

As a superscript, the sa mgo, it is silent in modern speech and its former presence is carried by the tone of the syllable beneath it. As a suffix it closes the syllable in the ordinary way. As a second suffix it is doing something different in kind, because in that position it is very often grammar rather than lexicon.

Sa is also the voiceless counterpart of za, distinguished from it in the classical language by voicing and in modern Lhasa speech by tone, which is the same trade the whole voiced series has made.

The one office sa lacks is the prefix. That leaves ra and sa as the two letters appearing in the greatest number of positions in the script, and between them they account for a good deal of what makes a Tibetan syllable look complicated on the page and read straightforwardly once the slots are known.

The Grammatical S at the End of a Syllable

A Tibetan syllable that ends in two consonants is very often ending in a grammatical marker rather than in part of a word, and the second of the two is normally sa.

The second suffix slot, the yang jug, takes only sa in the modern orthography, with the classical da drag as the other historical occupant. What sits there is typically a case particle or a verb ending fused onto the syllable it belongs to: the genitive is the most frequent, and several of the other cases and a number of verbal forms behave the same way.

For a reader this is a useful rule of thumb. Two finals means look for grammar. The word to be looked up in a dictionary is what remains when the second suffix has been taken off, and the second suffix itself is telling the reader what the word is doing in the sentence rather than what it means.

It is also one of the places where written Tibetan and spoken Tibetan diverge visibly. The second suffix has left the modern spoken language almost entirely, surviving as an effect on the vowel and the tone where it survives at all, so a syllable written with six letters may be spoken with three sounds and a pitch. The information is not lost; it has been recoded, and the writing is the record of where it used to sit.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Derived From

Tibetan sa continues the Brahmi sa, keeping its value and its place in the inherited order. The descent of the Tibetan script from the Brahmi family is not disputed; which Indic script of that family served as the immediate model in the seventh century is, and this link names the ancestor the atlas holds rather than choosing among the candidates.

Related To

Sa answers to Brahmi Sa, the same voiceless alveolar fricative; Tibetan has no counterpart to Brahmi's retroflex Ssa, matching the same retroflex omission Ta's own description states for the dental line.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)

Za and sa are the voiced and voiceless members of one pair in the classical language, and in modern Lhasa speech they are separated by tone rather than by voicing.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Sources
1. The Unicode Standard
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode ConsortiumView the Source
2. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996View the Source
3. Tibet: A History
Sam van Schaik, Yale University Press, 2011View the Source
Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the Other Indo-Aryan Languages
Richard Salomon, Oxford University Press, 1998View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.