Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Alphabet Letters

Yu Ю

Cyrillic Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin Developed in the late ninth or early tenth century, after the death of Constantine-Cyril, in the First Bulgarian Empire

Yu is the thirty-third letter of Cyrillic and writes a palatal glide followed by the vowel u. It is the first of a set of letters that write a glide plus a vowel with a single sign, a device Slavonic needed because those sequences were common at the beginning of words and after other vowels; the same principle produces the iotified e, the iotified a and the iotified yuses. Its shape is a ligature of the letter for i with the letter for o, joined by a bar, so the composition is visible. It remains in the modern Russian and Bulgarian alphabets with the same value. It has no numeral value, standing outside the Greek series from which the Cyrillic numbers are drawn.

Facts
Open Questions
Origin of the Name
Not established for this letter's own name
Yu's own description discusses the glide-plus-vowel principle its shape encodes, not the origin of its name, and gives none. Covered by the already-live OpenQuestion.
Sense of the Name
Not established for this letter's own name
Yu's own description gives no sense for its name at all. Covered by the already-live OpenQuestion.
Attributions
Associated Sound
The sequence yu, a palatal glide followed by u 1Tradition: Early Cyrillic, the alphabet of Church Slavonic
Origins
Origin Period
Developed in the late ninth or early tenth century, after the death of Constantine-Cyril, in the First Bulgarian Empire 2
Place of Origin
The First Bulgarian Empire, in the school of the disciples of Cyril and Methodius, with Preslav and Ohrid the two centres most often named 2
Identity
Script Type
An alphabet: one letter to a sound, built on Greek uncial letterforms with additional signs, several of them taken from Glagolitic, for the Slavonic sounds Greek could not write 1
Position
The thirty-third letter of the Early Cyrillic alphabet in the traditional order 1Tradition: Early Cyrillic, the alphabet of Church Slavonic
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Yu's shape, a ligature of the letter for i with the letter for o joined by a bar, makes its glide-plus-vowel composition visible on the page, the same principle behind every other iotified sign in the script. 1
Learn More
Yu: The Letter for a Glide and a Vowel

Yu stands thirty third and writes the sequence of a glide followed by the vowel u. It carries no numeral value.

Old Church Slavonic wrote such sequences with letters of their own rather than with two signs, and yu is the member of that group that survived everywhere. It is present in every modern Cyrillic alphabet, unchanged in shape and in value, where its companions in the iotified series have mostly gone.

The reason it survived and they did not is that the sequences the others wrote either disappeared or were absorbed. The iotified e fell together with the plain e in most of the East Slavic area. The iotified a became the modern letter for ya. The iotified yus letters lost their nasal vowels and had nothing left to write. Yu had no such fate: the sequence it represents remained common and distinct, so the letter kept its job.

In the modern alphabets it does a second job as well. Because Cyrillic marks consonant softness on the following vowel, this letter after a consonant no longer writes a glide at all; it writes a plain u and says that the consonant before it is soft. The same letter therefore means one thing at the start of a word and another in the middle of one, which is a general property of the Cyrillic vowel letters and the point of the companion article.

Writing the Glides

A glide before a vowel is easy to say and awkward to write, and Slavonic writing has taken three different approaches to it, all of them still visible.

The first is a dedicated letter for the sequence. That is what the iotified series is: single signs for the glide plus a, the glide plus e, the glide plus u and the glide plus each of the two nasal vowels. Several of them are transparently ligatures of a glide sign and a vowel letter, so the method is really a shorthand for the second approach rather than a separate principle.

The second is to write the two elements separately, glide sign plus vowel letter, which the manuscripts also do, inconsistently, alongside the ligatures.

The third emerged much later and is what the modern alphabets use. The iotified letters were reinterpreted: instead of meaning glide plus vowel, they came to mean either glide plus vowel at the start of a syllable, or plain vowel with a soft consonant in front of it. One sign, two readings, determined by position. That reinterpretation is what allowed Russian to write consonant softness without adding any diacritics to the consonants.

The shift is a good example of how a writing system changes without anyone deciding to change it. Nobody redefined these letters. The sound system moved underneath them, the letters went on being written in the same places, and their meaning was re-derived by readers from where they found them.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Derived From

Yu Ⱓ, Alphabet Letters

Why this is disputed. Yu writes the sequence of a glide and the vowel u, a combination Greek had no single sign for, and Cyrillic scholars generally read the sign as built by combining Cyrillic's own borrowed elements rather than copied whole from a single Glagolitic letter. Whether that counts as derivation from Glagolitic in the same sense as the simpler signs, or as a Cyrillic-side construction that merely echoes Glagolitic's general solution, is an open point in the letter by letter accounts.

Originates in Language

Yu is a letter of the Early Cyrillic alphabet, which was assembled to write Old Church Slavonic and which takes its letter names from that language.

Source Old Church Slavonic GrammarHorace G. Lunt

Related To

Cyrillic Yu writes the same sound and stands in the same place in the Slavonic alphabet. Neither script numbers the letter. Which of the two Slavonic scripts came first, and how much either owes the other, is argued rather than settled.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)

Yu answers to Glagolitic Yu: both write the same glide-plus-vowel sequence with the same glide-plus-vowel construction. Neither script numbers the letter.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Sources
1. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996on the Slavic alphabets, their letters and their numeral systemsView the Source
2. Byzantine Missions Among the Slavs: SS. Constantine-Cyril and Methodius
Francis Dvornik, Rutgers University Press, 1970on the Moravian mission and the making of the Slavic lettersView the Source
The Unicode Standard
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode Consortiumon the encoded characters, their names and their block assignmentView the Source
Old Church Slavonic Grammar
Horace G. Lunt, Mouton de Gruyter, 2001View the Source
Open Questions (1 open question)
Did the opaque letter names at the end of the Slavic alphabets, fert, kher, tsy and sha among them, ever carry a sense in Slavonic?

The first twenty letter names of both Slavic alphabets are ordinary Slavonic words and read together as connected sentences, from azu buky vedi, I know letters, through rtsy slovo tverdo, say the word firmly. After that point the names stop meaning anything recoverable. The reference literature records them as of uncertain or unknown origin and offers no reading. This is not a disagreement between scholars with rival etymologies; it is an absence. Nobody has established whether these names are corrupted Slavonic words, reflexes of Greek letter names, or labels that never meant anything at all, and the question has not been taken up.

What would resolve this A systematic etymological study of the full set of Slavic letter names, working from the earliest abecedaria and from the acrostic alphabet poems of the Old Church Slavonic tradition, which arrange the names in verse and may preserve senses that the plain lists do not. A finding that the names are demonstrably meaningless would settle the question as firmly as a set of etymologies would.
Slavic historical linguistics; Old Church Slavonic philologyPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), The World's Writing Systems
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.