Home›Articles›A World Held Not Ultimately RealArticlesA World Held Not Ultimately RealArticlesCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "A World Held Not Ultimately Real." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/seichonoie-phenomenal-world-not-real.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). A World Held Not Ultimately Real. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/seichonoie-phenomenal-world-not-realCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-a-world-held-not-ultimately-real, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {A World Held Not Ultimately Real}, year = {2026}, url = {https://dev-divinity.interactiveatlas.org/articles/seichonoie-phenomenal-world-not-real}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXLearn MoreCross-Tradition ConnectionsSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)Learn MoreA World Held Not Ultimately Real Seicho-no-Ie, the House of Growth, founded in Japan in 1930 by Masaharu Taniguchi, teaches that the phenomenal world as it presents itself, sickness, poverty and suffering included, is not the final reality but an appearance laid over a truer condition in which the human being is already whole and already a child of God. Susumu Shimazono's study of modern Japanese religious movements situates this teaching within a wider circulation of ideas: Taniguchi drew explicitly on American New Thought writing, encountered in translation and through his own reading, and set it beside Shinto and Buddhist material already present in Japanese religious life, along with a strong emphasis on ancestor veneration, producing a doctrine that reads as recognisably New Thought in structure while remaining culturally and doctrinally distinct from its American counterparts in its content. Shimazono's account notes that Taniguchi began the movement not as a temple or a church but as a magazine, circulating this teaching in print well before Seicho-no-Ie acquired the formal organisational apparatus, temples, ministers and structured congregational life, that a religious movement usually needs to sustain itself across generations, a print-first growth pattern the movement shares with several other Japanese new religions of the same interwar period.Cross-Tradition ConnectionsArticle OnThe Phenomenal World of Illness and Suffering Is Not Ultimately Real, Beliefs & Restrictions Well-attested Source From Salvation to Spirituality: Popular Religious Movements in Modern JapanSusumu Shimazonotier 1SourcesFrom Salvation to Spirituality: Popular Religious Movements in Modern Japantier 1Susumu Shimazono, Trans Pacific Press, 2004Shimazono's From Salvation to Spirituality, on Taniguchi's New Thought debt and the movement's founding as a magazineEncyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference)tier 2Encyclopaedia Britannica editors, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 2024Encyclopaedia Britannica online, corroborating Seicho-no-Ie's 1930 founding by Masaharu TaniguchiView the SourceComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year