Article one notes that "the motif of a testing bridge over which the dead must pass reappears in later religious traditions" without naming which ones. Islamic eschatology supplies the clearest and most structurally similar case, and comparing the two shows both a strong resemblance and a genuine difference in what the bridge tests.
Al-Sirat, described in hadith literature though not named as such in the Quran itself, is a bridge stretched over Hell that every soul must cross on the Day of Judgement, thinner than a hair and sharper than a sword's edge, over which the righteous pass swiftly, some as fast as lightning, while sinners falter and fall into the fire below. The imagery, a narrow crossing whose difficulty varies by moral standing, matches the Chinvat Bridge's structure closely enough that historians of religion generally treat some line of influence, direct or mediated through the shared late-antique Near East, as more likely than coincidence, though the exact route is argued rather than settled.
The difference is worth stating precisely rather than letting the resemblance obscure it. The Chinvat Bridge, as article one describes, is met by the daena, the soul's own conscience personified as beautiful or hideous depending on the life lived, making judgement an encounter with one's own moral self; al-Sirat's crossing follows a divine reckoning already rendered, the bridge enacting a verdict rather than constituting the encounter in which it is discovered. The shared architecture does not carry an identical theology of judgement along with it.