Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Beliefs & Restrictions

Arminianism (free will and universal atonement)

Also Known As Arminianism
Core Tenets

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1610 to 1619

Arminianism, named for the Dutch theologian Jacobus Arminius, holds that Christ died for all people, that God's grace goes before and enables any human response but can be resisted, and that election is conditional on foreseen faith. It is not a claim that people save themselves: prevenient grace, given to all, is what restores the freedom that sin destroyed. The Remonstrants set out five articles in 1610; the Synod of Dort rejected them in 1619, and the Reformed answer became the five points later remembered as TULIP. Wesley made Arminianism the theology of Methodism, and through it of the holiness and Pentecostal movements. Arminians divide over whether a believer can finally fall away, which Arminius himself left open and Wesley affirmed.

Facts
Status
Status Within the TraditionSourced to the subject's own account
Binding, without a formal definition 2Tradition: Methodism
Status Within the TraditionSourced to the subject's own account
Formally condemned by this tradition 1Tradition: Calvinism (Reformed)
Belief
SubjectSourced to the subject's own account
Salvation and liberation 1
Origins
Origin PeriodSourced to the subject's own account
1610 to 1619 1
Learn More
Arminianism

Methodists and Pentecostals characteristically affirm Arminian theology, that God's saving grace is offered to all, that Christ died for everyone (universal atonement), and that human beings, enabled by grace, are genuinely free to accept or reject salvation. Named for the Dutch theologian Jacob Arminius, the position holds that God's predestination is grounded in his foreknowledge of who will believe, and that grace, though necessary and prior, can be resisted. It thus affirms real human responsibility in salvation while insisting that the initiative and power belong to God.

Jacobus Arminius taught theology at the University of Leiden until his death in 1609, and the year after, his followers formalized his positions in the Remonstrance of 1610, a document setting out five articles, on election, the extent of the atonement, human depravity, the resistibility of grace, and the possibility of falling from grace, that they presented to the Dutch government as a request for toleration within the Reformed church; the Synod of Dort convened in response and, rejecting the Remonstrants' articles point by point, produced the five counter-points later summarized in English by the acronym TULIP, so the two positions have been defined against each other, article by article, since their very first formal confrontation.

Against the Calvinist Scheme

Arminianism defines itself over against the Reformed (Calvinist) doctrines of unconditional election, limited atonement, and irresistible grace, a controversy formalised at the Synod of Dort in 1618-19. Wesley made an evangelical Arminianism central to Methodism, and it passed into much of the Pentecostal and Holiness world. The affirmation shapes preaching that appeals to all to be saved and an understanding of assurance and of the possibility of falling from grace, marking one of the great enduring divisions of Protestant theology on the questions of election and free will.

John Wesley deliberately reclaimed the Arminian label, which had accumulated negative associations in some Reformed circles by the eighteenth century, founding a periodical in 1778 titled The Arminian Magazine specifically to defend and popularize the position among his own Methodist societies and to counter the Calvinism of contemporaries such as George Whitefield and the Countess of Huntingdon's connexion; the magazine's title was itself a statement, an open, unapologetic identification with a theological label Wesley judged worth rehabilitating rather than avoiding, and it helped fix Arminian as the standard name for the Wesleyan position within English-speaking Protestantism.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Source Manual of the Church of the NazareneChurch of the Nazarenethe holders' own account
Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)

Most Pentecostal bodies are Arminian, holding that the offer of salvation is free to all and may be accepted or refused, which fits the altar call and the summons to decide that mark their worship.

Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)
Source The Book of Discipline of the United Methodist ChurchUnited Methodist Churchthe holders' own account

Position On

Arminianism taken as the answer to the same question, conditional election and a universal atonement.

Related To

Where a tradition holds a universal atonement and a real cost at the cross, the governmental account is usually what lets it hold both.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)
Sources
1. The Canons of the Synod of Dort
Synod of Dort, 1619the holders' own accountView the Source
2. The Book of Discipline of the United Methodist Church
United Methodist Church, The United Methodist Publishing Housethe holders' own accountView the Source
Manual of the Church of the Nazarene
Church of the Nazarene, Church of the NazareneArticles of Faith, on prevenient gracethe holders' own accountView the Source
Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.