Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Beliefs & Restrictions

Complex marriage

Moral Precepts

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Complex marriage was the Oneida Community's teaching that in the kingdom of heaven, which the community held to have already arrived, exclusive marriage is abolished and every man is married to every woman in the community. Sexual relations were regulated by the community rather than by couples, pairing was deliberately rotated to prevent exclusive attachment, and from 1869 the community also practised selective breeding. It was argued theologically from the passage on there being no marriage in the resurrection, not adopted as a social scheme with a text found afterwards, and it was abandoned in 1879 under legal and internal pressure.

Facts
Status
Status Within the Tradition
Binding, without a formal definition 1
Argued theologically from the passage on there being no marriage in the resurrection. Abandoned in 1879 under legal and internal pressure, so this records the Oneida Community's own historical teaching rather than a currently practiced arrangement.
Scholarship and Forensics
Scholarly Note
It was argued theologically from the passage on there being no marriage in the resurrection, not adopted as a social scheme with a text found afterwards. 1
Belief
Subject
Community and its boundaries 1
Category of Belief
Core Tenets 1
Origins
Held By
The Oneida Community. 1
Learn More
John Humphrey Noyes' Doctrine of Complex Marriage

John Humphrey Noyes founded the Oneida Community in upstate New York in 1848 on the doctrine he called complex marriage, which held that every man in the community was married to every woman and every woman to every man, so exclusive pair bonding, along with the private property in a spouse it implied, was abolished as a form of selfishness incompatible with the perfected Christian life the community believed itself already living. Bible Communism, the community's own compilation of its founding theological reports, presents complex marriage as the logical extension of holding all property in common: if believers had already given up private ownership of goods and land for the community's shared benefit, Noyes argued, consistency required giving up exclusive ownership of a spouse as well, since the New Testament nowhere specifically institutes monogamous marriage as a permanent Christian requirement. In practice, any adult member could request relations with any other consenting adult member through an intermediary system intended to prevent exclusive attachments, which the community's leadership actively discouraged and at times formally intervened to break up when a couple showed signs of preferring each other over the wider community, since special love for one partner was itself treated as a doctrinal failure.

Male Continence and the Practical Machinery of Complex Marriage

Complex marriage required a practical method for separating sexual relations from reproduction, since a community practicing shared partnership among dozens of adults could not sustain uncontrolled childbearing, and Noyes supplied one in a technique he called male continence, in which men were trained to engage in intercourse without ejaculation, a discipline he taught as a skill any committed man could learn and presented as more considerate to women than the withdrawal or abstinence practiced elsewhere in reform circles of the period. Spencer Klaw's history of the community describes how this technical foundation let Oneida later launch a formal breeding program called stirpiculture in the 1860s, in which a committee approved specific pairings believed likely to produce spiritually and physically superior children, treating reproduction itself as a matter for communal planning rather than individual couples, a step considerably beyond simply permitting shared partnership. The system held for roughly three decades under Noyes's direct leadership, but mounting outside pressure, including threatened prosecution and Noyes's own flight to Canada in 1879, forced the community to abandon complex marriage that year and reorganize in 1881 as an ordinary joint stock company, Oneida Community Limited, ending the marital practice while its manufacturing business continued under conventional ownership.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.