Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Categories

Armanen Runes

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1902-1908: List reports the row in a vision during his blindness after an eye operation in 1902, and publishes it as Das Geheimnis der Runen in 1908

The eighteen Armanen runes are a rune row devised by the Austrian occultist Guido von List, who published it in 1908 after reporting a vision during a period of blindness. It is not a historical futhark: List built the row from the eighteen charms of the Old Norse Havamal and reinterpreted the letters through his own Germanic mysticism. It became influential in early twentieth-century Germanic occultism, including in circles connected to Nazi ideology, and it is recorded here as a documented modern system rather than an inherited one.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
1902-1908: List reports the row in a vision during his blindness after an eye operation in 1902, and publishes it as Das Geheimnis der Runen in 1908 1
Place of Origin
Vienna and the German-speaking völkisch milieu of the early twentieth century. 1
Creator / Originator
Guido von List (1848-1919), Austrian occultist and founder of Armanism 1
Origin of the Name
From List's "Armanen", a supposed ancient Germanic priest-caste for which there is no historical evidence. 1
Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern Use
List's Armanism, and the Ariosophy it fed, were explicitly völkisch and racial-nationalist; the row was taken up by figures around the Nazi movement and is still used in neo-völkisch and far-right circles. It is not a historical futhark. 1
Status
Standing as a Comparative Category
Largely abandoned as a comparative category 2
Overview
Size of the Traditional Set
18 runes 1
Structure
Structure
Eighteen runes, one for each of the eighteen charms Odin lists in the Old Norse Havamal. The forms are adapted from the historical futharks but the row of eighteen is List's own; no inscription attests it. 2
Learn More
The eighteen Armanen runes

The eighteen Armanen runes are a rune row devised by the Austrian occultist Guido von List, who published it in 1908 after reporting a vision during a period of blindness following an eye operation. It is not a historical futhark: List built the row of eighteen from the eighteen charms of the Old Norse Havamal, the "Song of the High One", in which Odin lists eighteen spells he knows.

Each Armanen rune is given a name, a meaning and an esoteric significance, and the row became foundational for the Armanist and Ariosophist currents of early-twentieth-century German-speaking occultism, and for later runic esotericism.

A modern occult row

The atlas treats the Armanen runes as a modern esoteric invention, distinct from the historical futharks: List derived the eighteen from a literary source and a personal vision, not from the runic inscriptions, and the system carries the marks of its time and milieu, including associations that later fed into problematic ideologies, which the atlas notes soberly.

The atlas gives each Armanen rune its name, form and meaning. The historical runes it should not be confused with are treated in the rune category, and the Armanen row belongs among the Modern Revivals.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Entries in This Category

Ar, Armanen Runes
Bar, Armanen Runes
Eh, Armanen Runes
Fa, Armanen Runes
Gibor, Armanen Runes
Hagal, Armanen Runes
Is, Armanen Runes
Ka, Armanen Runes
Laf, Armanen Runes
Man, Armanen Runes
Nauth, Armanen Runes
Os, Armanen Runes
Rit, Armanen Runes
Sig, Armanen Runes
Thorn, Armanen Runes
Tyr, Armanen Runes
Ur, Armanen Runes
Yr, Armanen Runes
Sources
1. The Occult Roots of Nazism: Secret Aryan Cults and Their Influence on Nazi Ideology
Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, Aquarian Press, 1985on Guido von ListView the Source
2. Runenkunde
Klaus Duwel, J. B. Metzler, 2008on modern runic mysticism
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.