Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Councils and Synods

The First Assembly of the World Council of Churches

Ecumenical Assemblies

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The assembly at Amsterdam that constituted the World Council of Churches out of a hundred and forty-seven member churches. It is council-shaped and deliberately not a council: the constitution it adopted denies the body any power to legislate for its members.

Facts
The Event
When It Happened
22 August to 4 September 1948. 1
Where It Happened
Amsterdam, Netherlands, opening with a service at the Nieuwe Kerk. 1
Principal Parties
147 founding member churches, represented by 351 voting delegates. W. A. Visser 't Hooft, editor of the official report, served as the Council's first general secretary. 1
Consequences
Lasting Consequence
The World Council of Churches was constituted by a hundred and forty-seven member churches on a basis confessing Jesus Christ as God and Saviour, under a constitution that gives the body no power to legislate for its members. 1
Reception
Reception
Most of the Orthodox churches joined after the first assembly, the Russian Orthodox Church at New Delhi in 1961. The Roman Catholic Church has never been a member and sends observers. 2
Learn More
One Hundred and Forty-Seven Churches

The assembly that constituted the World Council of Churches had been scheduled for 1941. It met in Amsterdam in August 1948, so the churches that gathered to constitute a common body were doing so three years after coming out of a war in which many of them had been on opposite sides, occupied, complicit, resistant or destroyed, and in some cases all of these at once.

A hundred and forty-seven churches joined. The basis of membership was a single sentence: a fellowship of churches which accept our Lord Jesus Christ as God and Saviour. It was deliberately minimal, because anything longer would have excluded somebody, and it was still not minimal enough for everyone.

The constitution adopted gives the council no power to legislate for its members. It cannot define doctrine, it cannot discipline a church, and it cannot act on a member's behalf without that member's consent. This is the essential difference between an assembly of this kind and a council in the older sense: it was built to be council-shaped and to have none of a council's authority, and that was the condition of anyone joining at all.

The four sections of the assembly reported on the universal church and God's design, the church's witness, the church and the disorder of society, and the church and the international disorder, which is a fair index of what the churches of 1948 thought was most urgent.

Membership Without Recognition

The obvious objection to a council of churches is that joining one looks like conceding the argument. If an episcopal church that holds valid orders to be necessary sits down as an equal member with a church it regards as lacking them, has it not admitted that the question does not matter?

The council answered this two years later, at Toronto, in a statement that made the whole enterprise workable. Membership in the World Council does not imply that a church regards the other member churches as churches in the true and full sense of the word. It does not imply that any doctrine of the church is being accepted, or that relativism about doctrine is being adopted. Each church retains its own understanding of what the church is and of where it is found.

That formulation is what lets bodies that deny each other's orders, sacraments and ecclesial standing sit in the same room and work together without either side conceding anything. It is a negative agreement, an agreement about what agreement is not being reached, and it has held for three quarters of a century.

The membership has grown well beyond 1948. Most of the Orthodox churches came in later, the Russian Orthodox Church at the New Delhi assembly of 1961, and the centre of gravity has moved decisively towards Africa and Asia. The Roman Catholic Church has never been a member. It sends observers, works with the council on particular commissions, and has consistently declined to join a body whose basis of membership is deliberately less than its own understanding of the church.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Element Of

The Kimbanguist church was admitted to the World Council of Churches in 1969, the first church founded in Africa by an African to be received into it.

Source Kimbangu: An African Prophet and His ChurchMarie-Louise Martin

The Church of England was among the churches that constituted the World Council at Amsterdam, and Anglican participation in it has been continuous since.

The Church of Sweden was among the founding member churches.

Constantinople was a founding member, and its participation gave the new body an Orthodox presence from the first day rather than as a later addition.

Methodist churches were among the founding members, and the ecumenical movement has been a settled Methodist commitment since.

Roman Catholicism, Denominations

The Roman Catholic Church is not a member of the World Council and was not present at its constitution. It has sent observers to the assemblies since the nineteen sixties and works with the council through a joint commission.

The Episcopal Church was among the founding member churches.

Rejected Here

Russian Orthodox Church, Denominations

Moscow declined the invitation to Amsterdam, and the conference of Orthodox churches it convened in the same year set itself against the ecumenical movement. The Russian church joined the council only in 1961.

Related To

Both assemblies of the World Council of Churches, forty-three years apart.

Both assemblies of the World Council of Churches, though not directly consecutive: the Second Assembly, Evanston 1954, sits between them and is not yet catalogued here.

Source The New Delhi Report: The Third Assembly of the World Council of Churches, 1961World Council of Churches, edited by W. A. Visser 't Hooft
Sources
1. The First Assembly of the World Council of Churches, Amsterdam 1948: Official Report
W. A. Visser 't Hooft (ed.), SCM Press, 1949
2. The Orthodox Church
Timothy Ware (Kallistos Ware), Penguin Books, 1993View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.