Deities
Erlik
Tengrist Deities
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
The lord of the underworld and of death across Turkic and Mongolic mythology and the wider Siberian shamanic world, ruling the realm beneath the earth in structural opposition to Tengri's sky. Erlik is one of the few figures shared by name and function across multiple Central Asian and Siberian traditions rather than belonging to a single people.
Facts
Attributions
Mythic AssociationAltai and other Turkic creation accounts describe Erlik as originally the creator god's companion, sent to dive beneath the primordial waters to bring up the first earth, before being cast down to rule the underworld after a falling out with Ulgen, a shared origin myth for the two rival powers. 1 Attestation
Veneration TodayActively venerated in a living tradition 3 Veneration TodayVenerated in a modern revival tradition 3 HistoricityNot a historical person: a divine or other-than-human being 2 Function
Domain / FunctionDeath Underworld 1Tradition: Tengrist and Siberian shamanic Belief
TheologyAnimist: persons and powers in land, water and living things 2 Learn More
Lord of the Underworld Beneath Tengri's Sky
Erlik, sometimes titled Erlik Khan, is the ruler of the underworld and the dead across a wide belt of Turkic, Mongolic and Siberian mythology, standing as the structural counterpart to Tengri's heights: where Tengri governs the sky and grants earthly kingship, Erlik governs the depths beneath the earth and claims the souls of the dead as his subjects.
Altai Turkic and South Siberian creation narratives frequently describe Erlik in an ambivalent origin, in some versions as a being who helped the creator god shape the early world before falling or being cast down into the underworld role he now occupies, a demotion narrative that gives him a more complex moral standing than a purely evil figure invented from nothing, closer to a fallen or rival cosmic power than a simple devil. As lord of the dead, Erlik in shamanic cosmology is not merely feared but actively negotiated with: Siberian and Altai shamans describe ritual journeys undertaken specifically to visit Erlik's realm, bargain for a sick person's soul, or otherwise intercede with him directly, treating him as an addressable cosmic authority with whom relationship and negotiation, not only avoidance, is possible.
One Figure Shared Across Several Peoples
Mircea Eliade's comparative survey of shamanism treats Erlik as a particularly clear example of how a single cosmological figure can be shared, with regional variation but a recognisably consistent core function, across peoples who are related but distinct: Altai Turkic, South Siberian Turkic groups, and Mongolic tradition all preserve versions of Erlik or a closely cognate underworld lord, reflecting the deep historical and linguistic connections running through Inner Asian shamanic religion rather than independent invention in each community. This atlas accordingly links Erlik to both Tengrism and Siberian Shamanism as the two registered religions in its scope where his cult is most directly documented, rather than duplicating him as two separate entries, since the underlying sources describe one continuous figure moving across a connected cultural and religious zone rather than two coincidentally similar deities.
Ronald Hutton's study of Siberian shamanism situates Erlik within the broader pattern of Siberian underworld lords who are engaged through the shaman's ecstatic journey rather than through fixed temple cult, a structural feature distinguishing Siberian and Inner Asian religion from more institutionally organised underworld cults found in settled agricultural civilisations elsewhere.
Sources Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of EcstasyMircea Eliade with Shamans: Siberian Spirituality and the Western ImaginationRonald Hutton
Correspondences & Relations
Cross-Tradition Connections
Opposes
Erlik rules the realm beneath the earth in structural opposition to Tengri's sky, the two poles of the Turkic and Mongolic cosmos.
Worshipped In
Erlik is one of the few figures shared by name and function across multiple historical Turkic and Mongolic peoples rather than belonging to a single one.
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.