The Persinger God Helmet Experiments, Studies
Standing
Concerns Replication Status
Currently States A double-blind trial at Uppsala University in 2005 randomised participants to the field or to a sham condition and found that measured suggestibility, not exposure, predicted the sensed presence. Persinger held that the Swedish exposure protocol differed from his own. No later double-blind trial has established the field effect.
Michael Persinger and Stanley Koren, at Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ontario, reported that applying weak, complex magnetic fields to the temporal lobes through an apparatus popularly called the God Helmet induced a sensed presence and mystical-type experiences in a substantial proportion of subjects. Pehr Granqvist, Mats Fredrikson and colleagues, in Sensed Presence and Mystical Experiences Are Predicted by Suggestibility, Not by the Application of Transcranial Weak Complex Magnetic Fields (2005), ran a double-blind replication in which neither subject nor experimenter knew whether the field was active, and found reported experiences correlated with each subject's independently measured suggestibility rather than with whether the field was on. The method on both sides is a controlled experimental exposure with self-reported outcomes, and the disagreement is over apparatus and shielding rather than the arithmetic of Granqvist's results, which Persinger's team did not dispute. Granqvist's team treats the failed replication as settling the question; Persinger's team contested whether the replication equipment reproduced the original field parameters closely enough to count as a fair test, and no further trial has been run to decide between them.
Source Sensed Presence and Mystical Experiences Are Predicted by Suggestibility, Not by the Application of Transcranial Weak Complex Magnetic Fields, Pehr Granqvist, Mats Fredrikson, Patrik Unge, Andrea Hagenfeldt, Sven Valind, Dan Larhammar and Marcus Larsson