Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Esoteric Texts

Arbatel de Magia Veterum

Also Known As Arbatel of Magic
Hermetic Texts

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

A short Latin treatise on natural and celestial magic, printed anonymously at Basel in 1575. Arranged as numbered aphorisms rather than a conjuration manual, it frames magic as a lawful science of nature granted by God, and it is the source of the seven Olympic Spirits, the planetary governors the atlas catalogues individually.

Facts
Origins
Era of CompositionSourced to the subject's own account
1575 1
Era of CompositionSourced to the subject's own account
Printed anonymously at Basel in 1575, a single slim volume unlike the sprawling multi-volume grimoires common in the same century. Only the first of a projected larger set of books, the Isagoge, ever appeared in print. 1
LanguageSourced to the subject's own account
Latin 1
Origin of the NameSourced to the subject's own account
Its title combines the coined word Arbatel, whose meaning has never been settled by scholarship, with the Latin phrase for the magic of the ancients, a naming choice various proposed derivations have not conclusively explained. 1
Text
Literary FormSourced to the subject's own account
Aphorism collection 1
Transmission
Manuscript TraditionSourced to the subject's own account
No manuscript witness predating the 1575 printed edition is known to survive, so the work is known to scholarship only through its early printings and their later translations. 1
Sources
Textual NoteSourced to the subject's own account
No author has ever been convincingly identified despite various attributions floated over the centuries. John Dee is known to have owned and studied a copy, one of several points where his own angelic conversations and the printed Arbatel tradition overlap. 1
Textual NoteSourced to the subject's own account
Robert Turner translated it into English in 1655, bound together with a work he presented as Agrippa's Fourth Book of Occult Philosophy, itself considered pseudonymous by modern scholarship. 1
Scholarship
First PublishedSourced to the subject's own account
Basel, in Latin, 1575. 1
Scholarship and Forensics
Scholarly Note
Historians of magic read the Arbatel as distinctive within the printed grimoire tradition for framing its operations as devout prayer toward the Christian God rather than as compulsion of spirits, a departure the scholar A.E. Waite already noted when he classed it apart from the Solomonic Key literature. 2
Open Questions
Attributed Author / Compiler
No author is named on the 1575 title page; authorship has never been settled by scholarship. 1
Sourced to the subject's own accountThe 1575 title page names nobody, and no later scholarship has settled who wrote it. This is an absence rather than a dispute: no candidate has been put forward and defended, so there is no attribution to argue against.
Learn More
A Basel Miscellany with No Name on the Title Page

Arbatel de Magia Veterum first appeared in print at Basel in 1575, in Latin, with no author named on its title page. That anonymity has never been resolved. The book surfaced from the same Swiss printing culture that was producing editions of Paracelsus and the surviving works of Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa, and its Latin has the careful, slightly defensive tone of a writer distancing his subject from the demonic conjuration manuals then circulating in manuscript. Modern critical work, chiefly Joseph H. Peterson's edition and translation, has not settled the authorship question; it has mainly corrected the text itself, since the version most English readers encountered for three centuries came through one intermediary.

That intermediary was Robert Turner, who translated the Arbatel into English in 1655 and bound it together with a work he presented as Henry Cornelius Agrippa's Fourth Book of Occult Philosophy, a text modern scholarship considers pseudonymous. The pairing was influential rather than accurate: generations of readers met the Arbatel as an appendix to a book it had no real connection to, and Turner's translation itself introduced errors that persisted until Peterson's edition returned to the Latin original.

The book's structure signals ambition beyond what survives. Its aphorisms are grouped in sevens, and the whole was evidently planned as seven such books of seven sevens, an arithmetic architecture typical of Renaissance number symbolism. Only the first book, titled the Isagoge, or introduction, was completed or has come down to us. Whether the rest were written and lost, or never written at all, is unknown. What survives is nonetheless a complete and self-contained system: instructions for approaching magic as licit natural philosophy, and the doctrine of the seven Olympic Spirits that occupies the second half of this record.

Seven Governors for the Ages of the World

The Arbatel's central teaching is that magic is a science given by God to be used for good, and that its unlawful use, seeking harm through demonic pacts, is a separate and forbidden art the book explicitly declines to teach. Framed that way, it presents a cosmology in which history itself is administered: the book divides time into ages of 490 years, each ruled in turn by one of seven Olympic Spirits, planetary governors who sit above the ordinary spirits of Western ceremonial magic rather than beside them.

The seven are Aratron of Saturn, Bethor of Jupiter, Phaleg of Mars, Och of the Sun, Hagith of Venus, Ophiel of Mercury, and Phul of the Moon, each already recorded in this atlas with the powers and subordinate spirits the Arbatel assigns to it. The text gives each one a domain of influence reaching from alchemy and longevity to political fortune, and instructions for the days and dispositions under which a practitioner might seek its favor. Unlike the Solomonic grimoires copied in manuscript at the same period, the Arbatel offers no circle of protection or coercive conjuration; its tone is petitionary, consistent with its claim to teach a benign, divinely sanctioned art.

That framing carried the book into the modern occult revival. Ceremonial magicians working from Turner's translation, and later from corrected editions, treated the Olympic Spirits as a planetary pantheon distinct from the Goetic entities of the Lemegeton, and the system remains current in planetary magic because the Arbatel presents it as complete in itself: seven spirits, seven planets, seven ages, with nothing left dangling from the books apparently never finished.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Attributed Works

One of the seven Olympic Spirits the Arbatel assigns to the seven classical planets.

Source Arbatel de Magia Veterum (Robert Turner's 1655 translation)Anonymous, first printed Basel 1575; English translation by Robert Turner, 1655

One of the seven Olympic Spirits the Arbatel assigns to the seven classical planets.

Source Arbatel de Magia Veterum (Robert Turner's 1655 translation)Anonymous, first printed Basel 1575; English translation by Robert Turner, 1655

One of the seven Olympic Spirits the Arbatel assigns to the seven classical planets.

Source Arbatel de Magia Veterum (Robert Turner's 1655 translation)Anonymous, first printed Basel 1575; English translation by Robert Turner, 1655
Och, Olympic Spirits

One of the seven Olympic Spirits the Arbatel assigns to the seven classical planets.

Source Arbatel de Magia Veterum (Robert Turner's 1655 translation)Anonymous, first printed Basel 1575; English translation by Robert Turner, 1655

One of the seven Olympic Spirits the Arbatel assigns to the seven classical planets.

Source Arbatel de Magia Veterum (Robert Turner's 1655 translation)Anonymous, first printed Basel 1575; English translation by Robert Turner, 1655

One of the seven Olympic Spirits the Arbatel assigns to the seven classical planets.

Source Arbatel de Magia Veterum (Robert Turner's 1655 translation)Anonymous, first printed Basel 1575; English translation by Robert Turner, 1655
Phul, Olympic Spirits

One of the seven Olympic Spirits the Arbatel assigns to the seven classical planets.

Source Arbatel de Magia Veterum (Robert Turner's 1655 translation)Anonymous, first printed Basel 1575; English translation by Robert Turner, 1655
Sources
1. Arbatel de Magia Veterum (Robert Turner's 1655 translation)
Anonymous, first printed Basel 1575; English translation by Robert Turner, 1655, Esoteric Archives (transcription), 1575View the Source
2. Grimoires: A History of Magic Books
Owen Davies, Oxford University Press, 2009View the Source
Open Questions (1 open question)
Who wrote the Arbatel de Magia Veterum?

The 1575 Basel edition names no author, and no signed manuscript or contemporary attribution has surfaced. Modern critical editions have examined the question without reaching a settled candidate.

What would resolve this A documentary link, a printer's record, a contemporary letter or an internal stylistic match tying the Latin text to a named figure in the Basel printing or physicians' circles of the 1570s.
History of science / early modern book historyAnonymous, first printed Basel 1575; English translation by Robert Turner, 1655, Arbatel de Magia Veterum (Robert Turner's 1655 translation)

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.