Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Esoteric Texts

The Dark Night of the Soul

Christian Mystical and Devotional Texts

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

John of the Cross's commentary on his own poem, explaining the passive purifications through which he says the senses and then the spirit are stripped of what they rest on. The phrase has passed into general use for any period of despair, which reverses his meaning: for John the darkness is God working, not God absent, and the distinguishing mark is that the sufferer still wants God and cannot want anything else. The treatise is unfinished and breaks off in the middle of its argument. It forms one work with the Ascent of Mount Carmel, which comments on the same poem from the active side.

Facts
Scholarship
Critical Edition
Kieran Kavanaugh and Otilio Rodriguez's The Collected Works of St. John of the Cross, first issued by ICS Publications in 1979 and revised in 1991 for the fourth centenary of his death, is the standard English critical edition and translation. 1
First Published
The work first reached print posthumously in 1618, more than two decades after the author's death, as part of a wider effort by his order to preserve and circulate his writings. 1
Origins
Language
Spanish 1
Attributed Author / Compiler
John of the Cross. 1
Composition Note
A poem with prose commentary distinguishing the night of the senses from the deeper night of the spirit 1Tradition: Carmelite (Spanish mystical)
Text
Literary Form
Commentary 1
Transmission
Manuscript Tradition
No manuscript in John of the Cross's own hand survives complete; the text is reconstructed from copies made by fellow Carmelites and disciples after his death. 1
Scholarship and Forensics
Scholarly Note
Composed in part during John's 1577 to 1578 imprisonment by Carmelites opposed to the Discalced reform 1Tradition: Carmelite (Spanish mystical)
Learn More
Two Darknesses, of the Senses and of the Spirit

John of the Cross's Dark Night of the Soul pairs a short poem with an extended prose commentary describing two successive purifications a soul undergoes on the way to union with God: the night of the senses, in which ordinary spiritual consolations and pleasures fall away, and the far more severe night of the spirit, in which even the soul's deeper faculties are stripped of felt certainty about God's presence. John insists these experiences of apparent abandonment are not signs of spiritual failure but a necessary, even a positive, stage of growth, since attachment to consolation, however holy it seems, still binds the soul to something less than God directly.

The phrase dark night of the soul has since migrated far beyond its precise theological meaning into everyday English, now used loosely for almost any period of despair or crisis, a use John's original technical, carefully staged account of spiritual purification does not straightforwardly support, since he is describing a specific and, in his account, ultimately fruitful process rather than despair as such. John draws his central image from the Song of Songs and other biblical love poetry, presenting the soul's passage through darkness as an act of love rather than an ordeal merely endured, which is part of why he pairs his prose commentary with verse rather than writing straightforward doctrinal exposition alone.

Composed Partly While Imprisoned by His Own Order

John of the Cross worked closely with Teresa of Avila as a leading figure of the Discalced Carmelite reform, and the resistance that reform provoked from unreformed Carmelites took a dramatic turn against John personally in 1577 and 1578, when opponents of the reform seized and imprisoned him in Toledo for several months in harsh conditions, during which he is traditionally said to have composed some of his most celebrated poetry, including material connected to the Dark Night. Whether every detail of that traditional account is precisely accurate, the imprisonment itself is well documented, and it gives the Dark Night's account of spiritual desolation a biographical weight that goes beyond abstract theological description.

The Collected Works of St. John of the Cross, the standard modern critical translation, presents the Dark Night alongside its companion treatise, the Ascent of Mount Carmel, since both works comment on the same underlying poem and were composed as complementary, overlapping treatments of the same material rather than as fully independent books. John was declared a Doctor of the Church in 1926, and the Dark Night remains one of the most closely studied texts in the entire history of Christian mystical theology.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Authored By

John's commentary on his own poem of the same name, left unfinished.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)
Sources
1. The Collected Works of St. John of the Cross
John of the Cross; trans. Kieran Kavanaugh and Otilio Rodriguez, ICS Publications (Institute of Carmelite Studies), 1991
The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.