Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Figures

Meister Eckhart

Also Known As Eckhart von Hochheim (German) His name; Meister is the Paris academic title.
Sages

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Meister Eckhart was a Dominican theologian who taught at Paris and preached in German to lay audiences and to communities of nuns, and whose sermons push the language of union with God further than his church was willing to follow. He spoke of a ground of the soul in which God and the soul are not two, and of a detachment that empties the self of everything, including its idea of God. Twenty eight propositions drawn from his work were condemned in 1329, shortly after his death, and the condemnation was of the propositions rather than of the man. His readers since have included Nicholas of Cusa, the German idealists and the modern comparative study of mysticism.

Facts
Life
Lifespan or Floruit
c. 1260-1328 1
Office Held
He served as provincial of the Dominican order for Saxony and later as vicar general for Bohemia, administrative offices he held alongside his university teaching and preaching. 1
Place of Activity
Erfurt, Paris, Strasbourg and Cologne, as a Dominican teacher and administrator 1
Position Profile
Key Text
His German sermons, preached to lay audiences and communities of nuns, are the body of work twenty eight propositions were drawn from and condemned in 1329. 1
Identity
Also Known As
Eckhart 1
Gender
Male 1
Status
Status Within the Tradition
Twenty eight propositions drawn from his sermons and treatises were condemned by the papal bull In agro dominico in 1329, issued shortly after his death, though the bull itself notes that he had submitted to the church's judgment before he died, so the condemnation fell on the propositions rather than declaring him personally a heretic. 1
Scholarship
How Its Legacy Is Contested
Twenty eight propositions drawn from his work were condemned in 1329, shortly after his death, though the condemnation targeted the propositions rather than the man himself. 1
Attestation
Historicity
Historically attested 1
Seventeen propositions drawn from his work were condemned by the bull In agro dominico in 1329, after his death; the judgement was on the propositions and not on the man
Publications
Notable Publication
His German sermons, preached to lay audiences and communities of nuns rather than written as academic Latin treatises, are the works modern scholarship treats as his most distinctive contribution, more radical in their vernacular language of divine union than his more cautious Latin university writing. 1
Disputed
Lifespan or Floruit
1260 to 1328 1
The source marks this year circa, its own approximate estimate rather than a fixed date.
Learn More
Preaching in German, About Nothing

Eckhart held the Paris chair reserved for foreign Dominicans twice, an honour otherwise given only to Thomas Aquinas, and wrote the Latin works of a professional scholastic. What he is read for is the other half: sermons preached in Middle High German to nuns and lay people, in a language with no technical theological vocabulary, which forced him to invent one.

Their recurring content is a movement of subtraction. He tells his hearers to become poor, and defines the poverty he means with unusual severity: a poor person wants nothing, knows nothing and has nothing, and that includes wanting to do God's will, since even that is still a will of one's own. What he calls detachment is the condition left when all of it has gone. Into that emptiness, he says, the Word is born, not once historically but now, in the ground of the soul, which is a place he describes as prior to the faculties and where God and the soul are not two.

He is also a startling reader of scripture. Preaching on Martha and Mary, he reverses the standard reading and prefers Martha, the busy one, on the ground that Mary is still enjoying something and Martha has got past needing to. The technique throughout is to push a familiar formula until it breaks and something is visible through the crack, and it is what makes the sermons dangerous to summarise.

The Trial, and In Agro Dominico

In 1326 the archbishop of Cologne opened an inquisitorial process against Eckhart, on the basis of lists of propositions drawn from his sermons and writings. He was a senior Dominican with a reputation across the order, and the proceeding was unusual enough that his defence has survived: he replied that some of the propositions were misquoted, that others were true if properly understood, and that he might err but could not be a heretic, since error belongs to the intellect and heresy to the will. He appealed to the pope at Avignon and travelled there.

He died before judgement, in 1328. The following year the bull In agro dominico condemned seventeen propositions as heretical and declared eleven more ill sounding and suspect, while recording that Eckhart had submitted himself to the judgement of the Holy See before his death. The condemnation was published in Cologne, and it kept his name out of open citation for centuries even as his material continued to circulate.

His readers did not stop. Tauler and Suso carried the teaching in a safer register, the anonymous Theologia Germanica passed it to Luther, and the whole Rhineland tradition rests on him. In the twentieth century he became one of the standard points of comparison with Zen and with Vedanta, and the Dominican order has petitioned Rome to state that the condemnation of 1329 no longer stands in the way of reading him.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Marguerite Porete, Figures

Why this is disputed. The annihilation of the soul in the Mirror is close enough to Eckhart's language that a connection has long been proposed, and the two were condemned by the same faculty within twenty years; whether he knew the book is not settled.

Source Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference)Encyclopaedia Britannica editors

The other half of Otto's 1926 comparison, in which Eckhart stands for the western form of the same mystical structure.

Belongs to Tradition

Sources
1. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.