Practices
Icon Painting
Devotional Practices
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Icon painting is the Orthodox tradition of making the sacred images the church venerates, and it is governed by theology as much as technique: the icon is defended, since the councils of the iconoclast controversy, as an affirmation that God truly took visible flesh, and the honour paid to the image passes to its prototype. Painters work within received models transmitted in pattern books, traditionally preparing with prayer and fasting, using egg tempera on gessoed board with gold leaf for the uncreated light. The craft is a church art first: iconographers are trained in workshops and monasteries, and a finished icon is blessed for veneration.
Facts
Practice
Category of PracticeThe painting, or writing, of icons in the Eastern Orthodox tradition follows established theological conventions and is traditionally approached as a spiritual discipline undertaken with prayer and fasting rather than as an exercise in individual artistic invention. 2 Who Performs ItTrained or authorised specialists 2 Solitary or Communal Mode of TransmissionSourced to the subject's own accountIcon painting technique and style are historically transmitted through named regional schools, among them Novgorod, the Stroganov school and Cretan painting, carried forward through monastic workshops and master to apprentice training rather than through open individual innovation. 3 Status
Status Within the TraditionSourced to the subject's own accountOrthodox convention leaves very little room for individual artistic license: an icon painter works within established symbolic conventions handed down by their school and workshop rather than composing freely. 3 Current StatusRemains a living church craft today, practiced in Orthodox monasteries and workshops worldwide as part of ongoing liturgical life. 2 Scholarly Standing DetailTheological legitimacy rests on the Second Council of Nicaea (787), which affirmed images on Incarnational grounds after the iconoclast controversy 1 Status TodayLiving tradition, practised today 2 Attributions
TraditionEastern Orthodox Christianity. 1 Origins
Place of OriginDefended, since the councils of the iconoclast controversy, as an affirmation that God truly took visible flesh. Form
Implements and MaterialsPainters work in egg tempera on a gessoed wooden board, applying gold leaf to render the uncreated light, materials chosen because the finished object is treated as a church object rather than a free composition. 1 Scholarship and Forensics
Scholarly NoteThe icon is defended, since the councils of the iconoclast controversy, as an affirmation that God truly took visible flesh, and the honour paid to the image passes to its prototype. 1 Learn More
Writing an Icon, Not Painting a Picture
Orthodox tradition speaks of writing an icon rather than painting one, a linguistic choice, preserved in Greek and Slavic liturgical usage, that signals the activity's status as something closer to theological composition than to artistic expression in the modern secular sense, governed throughout by inherited canon rather than by individual creative license.
The practice's theological legitimacy rests directly on the resolution of the Byzantine iconoclast controversy, an intense and often violent dispute across the eighth and ninth centuries over whether images of Christ and the saints were legitimate or idolatrous, settled in favour of icons at the Second Council of Nicaea in 787 on grounds that became foundational to Orthodox theology of the image: since God the Son truly took visible human flesh in the Incarnation, depicting Christ in material form does not violate the biblical prohibition on graven images but rather affirms the reality of God becoming genuinely, visibly human, an argument that makes icon painting a direct theological consequence of Christology rather than a merely decorative church custom. Traditional iconographers work from established prototypes and prescribed compositional patterns for each subject rather than working freely from imagination or live models, a constraint the tradition treats as a discipline serving theological accuracy and continuity across centuries rather than as an artistic limitation.
Prayer, Fasting and a Living Discipline
Traditional iconographers, historically monastics though today including a significant number of formally trained lay practitioners, are generally expected to prepare for the work spiritually as well as technically, through prayer, fasting and confession undertaken before and during the process of writing a significant icon, on the premise that the iconographer's own spiritual state genuinely bears on the fitness of the resulting image for its liturgical purpose, an expectation with no real parallel in the training of a secular painter. Technique follows an inherited and highly specific traditional method, working in egg tempera on wood panels prepared with gesso, building the image in successive translucent layers from dark ground toward light, a technical progression given its own theological reading within the tradition as an image of spiritual ascent from darkness toward divine light.
Once completed an icon is typically blessed liturgically before being placed for veneration, a step Orthodox theology treats as significant even though it does not, in Orthodox understanding, create the icon's sanctity from nothing so much as formally set apart for devotional use an image already understood as a legitimate window onto the person it depicts. Icon painting remains a fully living tradition today, taught in dedicated workshops and monastic schools across the Orthodox world and, increasingly, in the West, sustaining an unbroken technical and theological lineage across many centuries.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Belongs to Tradition
Kept in the Armenian Apostolic Church. The Coptic, Armenian and Syriac icon traditions are distinct schools with their own canons of proportion and colour, and are not branches of the Byzantine one.
Kept in the Church of Cyprus, autocephalous since the Council of Ephesus in 431.
Kept in the Church of Greece.
Kept in the Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria. The Coptic, Armenian and Syriac icon traditions are distinct schools with their own canons of proportion and colour, and are not branches of the Byzantine one.
Kept in the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, the see of first honour among the Orthodox churches.
Kept in the Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo Church. The Coptic, Armenian and Syriac icon traditions are distinct schools with their own canons of proportion and colour, and are not branches of the Byzantine one.
Kept in the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church. The Coptic, Armenian and Syriac icon traditions are distinct schools with their own canons of proportion and colour, and are not branches of the Byzantine one.
Kept in the Georgian Orthodox Church, which has used its own language and script in worship since the fifth century.
Kept in the Greek Orthodox churches.
The Coptic, Armenian and Syriac icon traditions are distinct schools with their own canons of proportion and colour, and are not branches of the Byzantine one.
Kept in the Romanian Orthodox Church, the one Orthodox church of the Byzantine tradition whose language is Romance.
Kept in the Russian Orthodox Church, in the Slavonic recension of the Byzantine books.
Kept in the Serbian Orthodox Church.
Kept in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
Related To
The icon itself, the object this practice makes
The veneration the finished icon receives
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.