Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Buddhist Modernism and the Rhetoric of Meditative Experience

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Robert Sharf's 1995 article in Numen, a leading peer-reviewed journal for the academic study of religion, is a standard critical source examining how the rhetoric of pure, unmediated meditative experience functions within modern Buddhist modernism, arguing that the claim of direct experience is itself a rhetorical and historically situated construction rather than a transparent report of what meditation reveals. Its strength is that it is a peer-reviewed article by a recognized scholar of Buddhism in a major journal in the field. Its limit is that it is a single article making one argument about one strand of modern Buddhist discourse, not a comprehensive survey of meditation practice across traditions, so a claim about a specific tradition's own understanding of meditative experience needs a source addressing that tradition directly.

Facts
Citation
Author
Robert H. Sharf
Publisher
Numen
Publication Year
1995
URL
https://brill.com/view/journals/nu/42/3/article-p228_2.xml
Source Type
peer-reviewed article
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published in Numen, a leading peer reviewed journal for the academic study of religion, Robert H. Sharf's article by a recognized scholar of Buddhism, peer reviewed university-level scholarship.
Notes
Robert Sharf's scholarly article on Buddhist modernism and the rhetoric of meditative experience.
Claims Backed By This Source (24 claims)

This source backs 24 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Historical Figures, 5 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 2 general references.
  • Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
  • Disciplines, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Subcategories, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Practices, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.