Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Comparative Dictionary of Ge'ez (Classical Ethiopic)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Wolf Leslau's dictionary is the standard scholarly lexicon of classical Ge'ez, built from systematic philological comparison, giving each entry beside its cognates across the other Semitic languages rather than treating Ge'ez in isolation. That comparative philological method, checkable against the specific cognate sets it presents, is the dictionary's real evidentiary basis. This atlas cites it here specifically for the letter-by-letter consonant correspondences between the Ge'ez fidel and the Northwest Semitic and Arabic alphabets. Use it to establish a specific Ge'ez word's meaning or its documented Semitic cognates; it is not a source on Ethiopian Orthodox theology or liturgy, which needs a source dedicated to that tradition directly.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Wolf Leslau's standard scholarly lexicon of classical Ge'ez, giving each entry beside its cognates across the Semitic languages; cited here for the letter by letter consonant correspondences between the Ge'ez fidel and the Northwest Semitic and Arabic alphabets.
Notes
The standard lexicon of classical Ge'ez, giving each entry beside its cognates across the Semitic languages. Cited here for the letter-by-letter consonant correspondences between the Ge'ez fidel and the Northwest Semitic and Arabic alphabets.
Citation
Author
Wolf Leslau
Publisher
Otto Harrassowitz
Publication Year
1987
Source Type
reference
Claims Backed By This Source (57 claims)

This source backs 57 claims across the atlas. As facts: 8 well-attested. As cited relationships: 24 holds. Plus 25 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Alphabet Letters, 48 claims: 24 holds, 24 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Figures, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.