Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme

Switch Atlas

The Inner World

The Civil World

The Natural World

Alphabet Letters

Tayt (Tha) ጠ

Ge'ez Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin Descends from the Ancient South Arabian script; the vocalised seven-order form appears on Aksumite inscriptions of the fourth century CE

Tayt is the twenty-first letter of the Ge'ez fidel and writes an ejective t, distinct from the plain t of tawe. Its name is the inherited Semitic one behind Hebrew tet. The ejectives are the sounds that most clearly mark Ge'ez and its descendants as Ethiopian Semitic rather than simply Semitic, and they are one of the features shared with the Cushitic languages of the same region, which is the sort of overlap that makes the Horn of Africa a linguistic area rather than a set of separate families sitting side by side.

Facts
Attributions
Associated Sound
An ejective t 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script
Practice
Liturgical and Scriptural Role
The script of the Ge'ez liturgy of the Ethiopian and Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo churches, where the text is chanted rather than read silently 4Tradition: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Christianity
Disputed
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Why the script was vocalised in the fourth century CE, after centuries of writing consonants alone, is argued and not settled 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script
The World's Writing Systems (Peter T. Daniels and William Bright, eds., Oxford University Press, 1996) reviews the Aksumite inscriptions that first show Ge'ez written with vocalisation, a fourth-century CE innovation that is not in dispute, and canvasses three explanations for why it happened then: an internal development inside the Aksumite royal chancery seeking a more precise script for administration; a response to the newly Christian court's need for scripture translated and taught with unambiguous vowels after Aksum's conversion under King Ezana; and influence carried by vocalised Indian scripts reaching the Aksumite court through Red Sea trade contact. Comparing the timing, the epigraphic evidence and the trade record for each explanation, the volume's contributors find none conclusive, since Aksum's fourth-century contacts touched all three at once; the dating of the change is settled, its cause is not.
Origins
Origin Period
Descends from the Ancient South Arabian script; the vocalised seven-order form appears on Aksumite inscriptions of the fourth century CE 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script
Place of Origin
The kingdom of Aksum, in the northern highlands of what are now Ethiopia and Eritrea 2Tradition: The Ge'ez script
Origin of the Name
The Ge'ez letter names are traditional names carried with the script; some are recognisably the inherited Semitic words and others are not, and the relation of the set as a whole to the Northwest Semitic names is only partly recoverable 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script
Transmission
Manuscript Tradition
Ge'ez scripture and liturgical books are copied by hand on parchment and bound between wooden boards, a practice that has continued without interruption 3Tradition: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Christianity
Open Questions
Sense of the Name
Not established for this letter's own name inside the Ge'ez tradition
Tayt's own description names Hebrew tet as its inherited Semitic cognate but states no sense. The comparative reconstruction credits tet with the sense serpent (already live on Hebrew Teth), but whether the Ge'ez tradition itself ever attached that sense to the name, rather than only the form, is untested.
Identity
Script Type
An abugida: each base consonant is written in seven vowel orders and is never written without a vowel of its own, which sets the script apart from the consonantal abjads of the rest of the Semitic family 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script
Position
Twenty-first of twenty-six in the halehame order, the traditional order of the fidel, which is not the inherited Semitic order 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script
How the Letter Joins
The letters do not join, and the script runs left to right, unlike every other Semitic script of comparable age 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script
Use
Ritual Use
Read, chanted and copied in the Ethiopian and Eritrean churches, and used for the religious texts of the Ethiopian Jewish tradition 3Tradition: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Christianity
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Ge'ez numbers are written with a separate set of twenty numeral characters, so no numeral value attaches to a letter and the script has no counterpart to Hebrew gematria or the Arabic abjad reckoning 5Tradition: The Ge'ez script
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Written in seven orders, ge'ez, ka'eb, salis, rabi', hamis, sadis and sabi', which carry the seven vowels of the classical language; the first order is the citation form and the others modify its shape 1Tradition: The Ge'ez script
Learn More
Tayt, and the Parent Script the Atlas Does Not Hold

Tayt writes an ejective t and continues the Semitic consonant behind the Hebrew teth, the Syriac teth and the emphatic ta of Arabic. It is the ejective partner of tawe, and the pair is inherited.

The relations recorded on this page and on the other twenty-five Ge'ez letters run sideways, to Hebrew, Syriac and Arabic, and never upwards. That is a limitation of the atlas rather than a claim about the script. The parent of the fidel is the Ancient South Arabian script, the monumental hand of the inscriptions of Saba, Qataban, Hadramawt and Main, and the atlas does not hold it as an alphabet. Until it does, a Ge'ez letter cannot be linked to the sign it actually descends from, only to the cousins that descend from a common ancestor further back.

The distinction matters because the two kinds of relation say different things. Ge'ez did not take its letters from Hebrew or from Arabic, and a chart that pairs them can be read as though it had. What the pairings record is common inheritance. The descent, the thing that would justify a relation pointing upwards, runs through a script of the Arabian peninsula that crossed the Red Sea and then, in Aksumite Ethiopia, was rebuilt into something its parent would not recognise.

Timkat, and a River Standing In for the Jordan

Timkat, the Ethiopian feast of the Epiphany, begins with this letter. It commemorates the baptism of Christ, and it is kept in January over three days with the largest processions of the Ethiopian year.

What happens is that the tabot of each church, the consecrated tablet from its sanctuary, is carried out wrapped in cloth on the head of a priest and taken in procession to a body of water, a river, a pool or a reservoir prepared for the purpose. The night is spent there in vigil and chant. In the morning the water is blessed and the people are sprinkled or immerse themselves, and the tabot is carried back. For most of the congregation this is the one occasion in the year when the tabot leaves the sanctuary and travels.

The feast is worth describing carefully because it makes the logic of the tabot visible. A church is a church because of the tablet in it, so a procession is not a display of an object belonging to the building; it is the building's centre moving through the town with everyone behind it. Reading the tabot as an Ethiopian equivalent of a Western altar stone misses that. The atlas describes the practice and leaves the comparison alone.

The feast falls in the Ethiopian month of Terr, which lands in January, and it takes its date from the Ethiopian calendar rather than from a Western one, so a visitor working from a Gregorian diary can find it a day out from what a guidebook says. That is a small instance of a general point about this tradition. Its year is calculated by its own rules and converted afterwards, if at all.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Related To

Payt (Pha) ጰ, Alphabet Letters

Why this is disputed. Payt, the ejective p, is generally explained as a sign made by modifying tayt to write a sound the Semitic inheritance did not supply. Which existing sign was modified, and at what point in the script's development the new letter was added rather than being present from the start, is argued from the surviving inscriptional evidence rather than settled by it.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Teth ܛ, Alphabet Letters

Tayt and the Syriac teth continue the Semitic emphatic t. Ge'ez makes it an ejective; Syriac does not distinguish it in its modern reading.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)
Teth ט, Alphabet Letters

Tayt and the Hebrew teth continue the Semitic emphatic t. Ge'ez realises it as an ejective. The Hebrew reading tradition no longer distinguishes it from a plain t.

Source Comparative Dictionary of Ge'ez (Classical Ethiopic)Wolf Leslau
Sources
1. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996View the Source
2. Ancient Churches of Ethiopia: Fourth-Fourteenth Centuries
David W. Phillipson, Yale University Press, 2009
3. Ethiopia and the Bible (The Schweich Lectures 1967)
Edward Ullendorff, Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 1968View the Source
4. Ethiopian Christian Liturgical Chant: An Anthology
Kay Kaufman Shelemay and Peter Jeffery, A-R Editions, 1993
5. The Unicode Standard
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode ConsortiumView the Source
Comparative Dictionary of Ge'ez (Classical Ethiopic)
Wolf Leslau, Otto Harrassowitz, 1987
Open Questions (1 open question)
Do the Ge'ez letter names carry a sense inside Ge'ez, or are they inherited forms only?

A few Ge'ez letter names are transparently words in the language: bet is a house, gaml is a camel, and the word behind res is the word for a head. Most are not, and several, nahas among them, resemble Ge'ez words closely enough to invite a gloss that nothing supports. The atlas records no meaning for those letters, which is a statement about the evidence and leaves open whether the Ethiopian tradition itself ever attached senses to them.

What would resolve this A survey of the Ge'ez grammatical and church-school literature for any indigenous account of the letter names, set against the comparative reconstruction of the Northwest Semitic names, would show whether an Ethiopian gloss tradition exists and what it says.
Ethiopian philology and the history of the traditional church schoolsDivinity Atlas Open Questions Register, First Edition
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.