Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Fools Crow v. Gullet, D.S.D. 1982, affirmed 8th Cir. 1983

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Fools Crow v. Gullet, decided by the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota and affirmed by the Eighth Circuit, is a primary legal source, a real case in which Lakota religious leaders sought to restrict tourist access and development at Bear Butte, a site sacred to multiple Plains nations, under free exercise and American Indian Religious Freedom Act claims. As the actual court opinions, they are directly authoritative for what the courts held and their stated legal reasoning, which ruled against the plaintiffs. The decision is frequently cited in the broader legal and scholarly literature on Native American sacred site protection as an example of how narrowly courts of that era read religious freedom claims against public land access, a context worth carrying alongside the bare holding.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Fools Crow v. Gullet, decided by the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota and affirmed by the Eighth Circuit, is the actual court opinion itself, treated at the top tier as direct primary legal text for what the courts held regarding tourist access and development at Bear Butte.
Notes
The United States District Court for the District of South Dakota's own ruling in Fools Crow v. Gullet (1982, affirmed by the Eighth Circuit in 1983); the court's ruling on the legal claim before it, not a historical or religious-studies account of the sacred site at issue.
Citation
Author
United States District Court for the District of South Dakota
Publication Year
1982
Source Type
Case law
Claims Backed By This Source (14 claims)

This source backs 14 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sacred Sites, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 6 claims: 6 well-attested.

Holds

2

General References

1
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.