Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sacred Sites

Mato Paha (Bear Butte)

Lakota Sites

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

A laccolith standing alone on the plains northeast of Sturgis, South Dakota. To the Lakota it is Mato Paha, Bear Mountain. To the Northern Cheyenne it is Noaha-vose, the Giving Hill, where the prophet Sweet Medicine received the teaching from which Cheyenne religious, political and social order derives, which makes it not one sacred place among several but the source of the covenant itself. It is in continuous ceremonial use by both nations and by others. The prayer cloths and tobacco ties along its trails are offerings left by people who are still there, and the standing request to visitors is to leave them alone and to keep quiet.

Facts
Geography
Latitude
44.5 degrees north 2
Approximate reference point, rounded to one decimal place; this marks the site's general location for a map, not a survey-grade or precise boundary measurement.
Longitude
103.4 degrees west 2
Approximate reference point, rounded to one decimal place; this marks the site's general location for a map, not a survey-grade or precise boundary measurement.
Site
Type of Site
Sacred mountain, hill or peak 1
Type of Site Detail
Isolated laccolith hill on the plains of western South Dakota, a state park under co-management that keeps its trails and summit in continuous ceremonial use by the Lakota and Northern Cheyenne, with prayer cloths and tobacco ties left along its paths by visiting worshippers. 2
Attributions
Tradition
Lakota and Cheyenne 1
Status
Status Today
In active religious use 1
UNESCO World Heritage
Not Inscribed 3
Confirmed absent from the United States' 27 inscribed World Heritage sites and 16 tentative-list entries, verified live 2026-08-06.
Origins
Country
United States 1
Region
North America 1
Location
Location of Mato Paha (Bear Butte) Afghanistan Albania Algeria Angola Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Benin Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Estonia Eswatini Ethiopia Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Polynesia Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Guam Guatemala Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kuwait Laos Latvia Lebanon Libya Lithuania Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Mali Malta Mauritius Mexico Moldova Mongolia Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nigeria North Macedonia Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands South Africa South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tanzania Thailand Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Vatican City Venezuela Vietnam Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe
Learn More
A Policy Without a Remedy

Bear Butte is a state park. It has been one since 1961, and a National Historic Landmark since 1981, which means a place of continuous active prayer is administered by an agency whose statutory job is recreation. Almost everything that has happened there since follows from that.

Fools Crow v. Gullet

When park officials imposed limits on when ceremonies could be held and how long they could last, Frank Fools Crow and other Lakota and Cheyenne plaintiffs sued under the First Amendment and the American Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978. They lost in the district court in 1982, lost on appeal, and were refused a hearing by the Supreme Court.

The case is the standard citation for what was wrong with the 1978 Act. It declared a federal policy of protecting Native religious practice and created no cause of action to enforce it, a statement of intent with nothing behind it. That gap is why Congress had to legislate separately and specifically for peyote in 1994, and it is the reason later sacred-site claims were brought under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act instead, where they have mostly failed for a different reason.

What the nations did instead

The pressure at Bear Butte turned commercial. The Sturgis Motorcycle Rally brings hundreds of thousands of people to within a few miles each August, and proposals for bars, campgrounds and a shooting range near the mountain have had to be fought one at a time, each on its own permit.

So the nations changed tactics and started buying. In a series of purchases between 2016 and 2018, the Northern Cheyenne, the Rosebud Sioux and others acquired land around the butte outright.

Buying back land you already hold sacred is now the most reliable form of sacred-site protection in the United States. Not because it is just, it requires a people to pay for what was taken from them, but because a deed does not depend on a court agreeing that your religion counts.

The mountain is in use. The prayer cloths and tobacco ties along the trails are offerings left by people who are still there, and the standing request to visitors is to leave them untouched and to keep quiet.

One Mountain, Two Nations, Separate Traditions

Bear Butte rises alone well outside the main body of the Black Hills, and that isolation is part of why two different nations converge on it independently.

A shared destination, held separately

Both the Lakota, who call the butte Mato Paha, and the Cheyenne, for whom it holds a central place in the story of the prophet Sweet Medicine receiving sacred teachings inside the mountain, treat the site as a place for prayer, fasting and vision seeking, each within its own tradition rather than as a shared ceremony. Visitors today commonly see strips of cloth and small bundles tied to trees along the mountain's trails, left as prayer offerings; their specific meanings and the practices behind them belong to the traditions that place them and are not explained for outside instruction here.

Geology like its more famous neighbour

Like Devils Tower roughly ninety miles to the west, Bear Butte is generally classified as a laccolith, an intrusion of magma that domed the rock layers above it before erosion exposed the harder core, giving the two landmarks a comparable origin despite their different final shapes.

Protected, but surrounded

South Dakota manages Bear Butte as a state park specifically to preserve access for ceremonial use, but nearby private development, including large seasonal motorcycle rally events in the area, has repeatedly raised concerns among tribal members about noise and disruption reaching a site whose value depends partly on quiet.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Bear Butte remains in ceremonial use and is among the places where the presence of paying spectators is contested.

Source Lakota Belief and RitualJames R. Walker; edited by Raymond J. DeMallie and Elaine A. Jahner

Belongs to Tradition

Source Fools Crow v. Gullet, D.S.D. 1982, affirmed 8th Cir. 1983United States District Court for the District of South Dakota

Contained In

Related To

Bear Butte stands at the edge of the Black Hills and is part of the same Lakota and Cheyenne sacred geography.

Source Fools Crow v. Gullet, D.S.D. 1982, affirmed 8th Cir. 1983United States District Court for the District of South Dakota
Sources
1. Fools Crow v. Gullet, D.S.D. 1982, affirmed 8th Cir. 1983
United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, 1982Restrictions on ceremony upheld
2. Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference)
Encyclopaedia Britannica editors, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 2024View the Source
3. UNESCO World Heritage List
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO World Heritage CentreView the Source
American Indian Religious Freedom Act Amendments of 1994 (Pub. L. 103-344)
United States Congress, Public Law 103-344, 42 U.S.C. 1996a, 1994The 1978 Act and its later amendmentView the Source

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.