Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Hadith as Scripture: Discussions on the Authority of Prophetic Traditions in Islam

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Aisha Musa's study works from the documented historical debate over hadith authority within Islamic scholarship, including the Quranist rejection of that authority, tracing the actual arguments named parties have made rather than asserting one side's position as settled fact. That direct engagement with a real, named scholarly and sectarian controversy is the study's real evidentiary basis. This record has not independently traced further scholarly response to Musa's specific claims since 2008. Use it for established facts about this debate over hadith authority and the named positions within it; an academic study of the controversy itself, not a source on the specific content of any one hadith collection such as Sahih Muslim or Kitab al-Kafi, which needs a source focused on that collection directly.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Aisha Musa's study working from the documented historical debate over hadith authority within Islamic scholarship, including the Quranist rejection of that authority, tracing the actual arguments named parties have made rather than asserting one side's position as settled.
Notes
Aisha Musa's scholarly study of debates over the authority of hadith as a source of Islamic law and doctrine, including the Quranist rejection of hadith authority. Use for established facts about this debate and the named positions within it; an academic study of the controversy itself, not a source on the specific content of any one hadith collection such as Kitab al-Kafi, which needs a source focused on that collection.
Citation
Author
Aisha Y. Musa
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan
Publication Year
2008
URL
https://archive.org/details/hadith-as-scripture
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (174 claims)

This source backs 174 claims across the atlas. As facts: 90 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 22 holds, 2 connected, 3 critiqued Here, 24 rejected Here. Plus 32 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Scriptures & Texts, 90 claims: 35 well-attested, 16 holds, 24 rejected Here, 15 general references.
  • Articles, 27 claims: 22 well-attested, 2 connected, 3 general references.
  • Denominations, 21 claims: 15 well-attested, 5 holds, 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 11 claims: 5 well-attested, 6 general references.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 2 general references.
  • Doctrines, 8 claims: 1 holds, 3 critiqued Here, 4 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Figures, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Holds

22

Denominations

Doctrines

Scriptures & Texts

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.