Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Helter Skelter: The True Story of the Manson Murders

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Vincent Bugliosi was the lead prosecutor at the 1970 and 1971 trial of Charles Manson and several followers for the August 1969 Tate-LaBianca murders, and this 1974 book, written with Curt Gentry, is his own account of the investigation and trial, built around the motive he argued to the jury: that Manson believed an apocalyptic race war he called Helter Skelter was imminent and ordered the killings to help set it off. It became one of the best selling true crime books ever published and fixed that motive as the case's standard public explanation for the following decades. Its authorship is also its clearest limit: Bugliosi needed this exact motive to establish that Manson, who was not present at the killings, had directed them, an interest a later independent investigation, recorded separately in this atlas, argues shaped how completely the book's account can be trusted as the full explanation. Use it for the documented trial record and the motive as the prosecution presented and proved it; read the later investigation alongside it for a disputing account of how complete that explanation actually is.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Written by the lead prosecutor of the case it describes, who needed exactly this motive established to convict a defendant who was not present at the killings; the register's standard secondary-source tier, not its top scholarly tier, precisely because of that documented interest, and cross checked here against a later, independent investigation.
Notes
The prosecutor's own account of the 1969 Tate-LaBianca murders and the trial that followed, establishing the "Helter Skelter" apocalyptic race war motive as the case's standard explanation; the best selling true crime book of its era.
Citation
Author
Vincent Bugliosi with Curt Gentry
Publisher
W. W. Norton and Company, New York
Publication Year
1974
Source Type
Book (popular history)
Claims Backed By This Source (40 claims)

This source backs 40 claims across the atlas. As facts: 31 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds, 2 connected. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Articles, 14 claims: 10 well-attested, 2 connected, 2 general references.
  • Prophecies, 11 claims: 7 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.