Josephine Quinn's In Search of the Phoenicians, published by Princeton University Press in 2018, argues against treating the Phoenicians as a single unified ethnic or religious group at all, contending that the shared Phoenician identity read into the ancient Mediterranean world was substantially a later Greek, Roman and even modern nationalist invention rather than how Phoenician speaking city-states actually understood themselves. Quinn is a specialist in ancient Mediterranean history whose argument here is deliberately revisionist against the field's own prior consensus. Its strength is close engagement with primary inscriptional and archaeological evidence to challenge an assumption many earlier accounts, including some the atlas itself may otherwise draw on, simply took for granted. Its limit is that a genuinely revisionist argument has not yet become field consensus, so a claim asserting the Phoenicians definitely lacked shared religious identity as settled fact overstates the case; Quinn's argument is a serious, contested position within an active debate.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Josephine Quinn's In Search of the Phoenicians, published by Princeton University Press in 2018, is a scholarly monograph by a specialist in ancient Mediterranean history, treated at the top tier as peer reviewed academic press scholarship, notwithstanding that its revisionist argument is a contested position within an active debate rather than settled consensus. NotesJosephine Quinn's scholarly study questioning the coherence of a unified Phoenician identity.
Citation
AuthorJosephine Quinn
PublisherPrinceton University Press
Publication Year2018
Source Typeacademic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Phoenicians directly: "Josephine Quinn's In Search of the Phoenicians, published by Princeton University Press in 2018, argues against treating the Phoenicians as a single unified ethnic or religious group at all..."
Claims Backed By This Source (79 claims)
This source backs 79 claims across the atlas. As facts: 38 well-attested, 5 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 26 holds. Plus 10 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Deities, 47 claims: 27 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 14 holds, 3 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Pantheons, 7 claims: 1 well-attested, 5 holds, 1 general references.
- Religions, 7 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 4 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Bodies of Water, 3 claims: 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Cities, 2 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Cultures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.