Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Once Upon a Future Time: Studies in a Buddhist Prophecy of Decline

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Jan Nattier's Once Upon a Future Time, Studies in a Buddhist Prophecy of Decline, published by Asian Humanities Press in 1991, is a scholarly study of the Buddhist doctrine of the decline of the dharma across Indian, Chinese and other Asian textual traditions, examining how a prophecy of the teaching's eventual disappearance took different forms in different Buddhist cultures and periods. Nattier is a recognised specialist in early and East Asian Buddhist textual history. Its strength is the comparative range across traditions usually studied separately, and its standing as a frequently cited reference on the decline-of-the-dharma theme specifically. Its limit is that the study is more than three decades old and newer manuscript discoveries have refined some of the textual chronology it relies on, so a claim resting on a precise dating within the book should be checked against more recent philological work on the specific texts involved.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published by Asian Humanities Press in 1991, Jan Nattier's scholarly comparative study by a recognised specialist in early and East Asian Buddhist textual history, treated at the top tier.
Notes
Jan Nattier's scholarly study of a Buddhist prophecy of decline.
Citation
Author
Jan Nattier
Publisher
Asian Humanities Press
Publication Year
1991
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (57 claims)

This source backs 57 claims across the atlas. As facts: 33 well-attested, 9 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 4 holds, 3 connected. Plus 8 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Doctrines, 19 claims: 11 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 3 connected, 2 general references.
  • Ages, 17 claims: 5 well-attested, 6 scholarly debate, 3 holds, 3 general references.
  • Articles, 13 claims: 10 well-attested, 1 holds, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.