The Report of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar, document A/HRC/39/64, published by the United Nations Human Rights Council in 2018, is the UN's own official investigative report finding that Myanmar's military conducted the 2017 campaign against the Rohingya with genocidal intent, based on the mission's own interviews with survivors, satellite imagery and documentary evidence gathered over its mandate. Its strength is institutional standing and method, a formally mandated international fact-finding body with subpoena-like investigative authority and a stated evidentiary methodology, producing findings the UN itself adopted rather than a single outside researcher's account. Its limit is that the mission was denied access to Myanmar itself by the government, so its evidence was gathered from refugees, satellite data and outside sources rather than on the ground investigation within the country, a constraint the report itself states plainly and that any claim resting on granular on site detail should account for.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
A report of the United Nations Human Rights Council's own Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar, the primary institutional record of that body's own findings. NotesThe United Nations Human Rights Council's own fact-finding mission report on Myanmar (A/HRC/39/64, 2018); the official inquiry's findings, not independent academic scholarship.
Citation
AuthorUnited Nations Human Rights Council
Publication Year2018
Source TypeInternational body
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Myanmar directly: "International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar, document A/HRC/39/64, published by the United Nations Human Rights Council in 2018, is the UN's own official investigative report finding that..."
This source names Rohingya directly: "the 2017 campaign against the Rohingya with genocidal intent, based on the mission's own interviews with survivors, satellite imagery and documentary evidence gathered over its mandate."
Claims Backed By This Source (34 claims)
This source backs 34 claims across the atlas. As facts: 22 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 7 holds, 1 connected. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Religious Events, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Cultures, 8 claims: 3 well-attested, 4 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Open Questions, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.