Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Caliphs and their Non-Muslim Subjects: A Critical Study of the Covenant of Umar

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

A. S. Tritton's The Caliphs and their Non-Muslim Subjects is a scholarly critical study, published by Oxford University Press, of the Covenant of Umar, the set of conditions traditionally said to govern the status of Christians and Jews under early Islamic rule, and of how caliphs actually treated non Muslim subjects in practice. Despite its age, it remains a standard reference specifically because Tritton treated the Covenant of Umar critically as a text with a debated and possibly later composite origin rather than accepting its traditional attribution uncritically, a methodological caution later scholarship has largely vindicated. Its limit is the ordinary one for a study now nearly a century old, more recent scholarship has refined the dating and regional variation of dhimmi status considerably, so a claim about a specific period or region benefits from checking newer specialist scholarship alongside this foundational critical study.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A. S. Tritton's The Caliphs and their Non-Muslim Subjects, published by Oxford University Press, is a scholarly critical study, treated at the top tier as academic press scholarship, notable for treating the Covenant of Umar critically as a text of debated origin rather than accepting its traditional attribution uncritically.
Notes
Scholarly critical study of the Covenant of Umar and the caliphs' treatment of non-Muslim subjects.
Citation
Author
A. S. Tritton
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication Year
1930
Source Type
academic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Umar, Figures

This source names Umar directly: "University Press, of the Covenant of Umar, the set of conditions traditionally said to govern the status of Christians and Jews under early Islamic rule, and of how caliphs actually treated non..."

Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)

This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Religious Legal Instruments, 6 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.

Scholarly debate

1

Religious Legal Instruments

General References

1

Religious Legal Instruments

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.