A. S. Tritton's The Caliphs and their Non-Muslim Subjects is a scholarly critical study, published by Oxford University Press, of the Covenant of Umar, the set of conditions traditionally said to govern the status of Christians and Jews under early Islamic rule, and of how caliphs actually treated non Muslim subjects in practice. Despite its age, it remains a standard reference specifically because Tritton treated the Covenant of Umar critically as a text with a debated and possibly later composite origin rather than accepting its traditional attribution uncritically, a methodological caution later scholarship has largely vindicated. Its limit is the ordinary one for a study now nearly a century old, more recent scholarship has refined the dating and regional variation of dhimmi status considerably, so a claim about a specific period or region benefits from checking newer specialist scholarship alongside this foundational critical study.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
A. S. Tritton's The Caliphs and their Non-Muslim Subjects, published by Oxford University Press, is a scholarly critical study, treated at the top tier as academic press scholarship, notable for treating the Covenant of Umar critically as a text of debated origin rather than accepting its traditional attribution uncritically. NotesScholarly critical study of the Covenant of Umar and the caliphs' treatment of non-Muslim subjects.
Citation
AuthorA. S. Tritton
PublisherOxford University Press
Publication Year1930
Source Typeacademic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Umar, Figures This source names Umar directly: "University Press, of the Covenant of Umar, the set of conditions traditionally said to govern the status of Christians and Jews under early Islamic rule, and of how caliphs actually treated non..."
Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)
This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Religious Legal Instruments, 6 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Well-attested
11Religious Legal Instruments
Scholarly debate
1Religious Legal Instruments
Holds
3Religious Legal Instruments
General References
1Religious Legal Instruments
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.