Mark S. G. Dyczkowski is a scholar of Kashmir Shaivism, and this academic book, published by State University of New York Press, examines the doctrine of spanda, or vibration, central to Kashmir Shaiva philosophy and practice, working from Sanskrit primary texts and their commentarial tradition. Its strength is close textual engagement with the original Sanskrit philosophical literature of this specific tantric tradition, translated and analyzed with specialist precision. Its limit is that, as a technical study of one specific doctrinal concept within one specific tantric school, it assumes some background familiarity with Kashmir Shaiva philosophy generally, and it does not attempt to cover the full range of tantric Shaiva traditions beyond this particular lineage's own teaching.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Mark S. G. Dyczkowski's scholarly analysis of the doctrines and practices of Kashmir Shaivism, focused on the doctrine of vibration, spanda; a focused philosophical study, so a claim requiring detail on a specific named Kashmir Shaiva text such as the Tantraloka may need a source focused on that text. NotesMark Dyczkowski's scholarly analysis of the doctrines and practices of Kashmir Shaivism, focused on the doctrine of vibration (spanda). Use for established scholarly facts about Kashmir Shaivism's philosophical doctrine such as pratyabhijna (recognition); a focused philosophical study, so a claim requiring detail on a specific named Kashmir Shaiva text such as the Tantraloka may need a source focused on that text.
Citation
AuthorMark S. G. Dyczkowski
PublisherState University of New York Press
Publication Year1987
Source Typeacademic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names New York directly: "book, published by State University of New York Press, examines the doctrine of spanda, or vibration, central to Kashmir Shaiva philosophy and practice, working from Sanskrit primary texts and their..."
Claims Backed By This Source (68 claims)
This source backs 68 claims across the atlas. As facts: 39 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 14 holds, 3 connected. Plus 10 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Articles, 16 claims: 11 well-attested, 2 connected, 3 general references.
- Denominations, 16 claims: 4 well-attested, 10 holds, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Doctrines, 11 claims: 6 well-attested, 3 holds, 2 general references.
- Scriptures & Texts, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Beliefs & Restrictions, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Regions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.