Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Enneagram: G. I. Gurdjieff's Esoteric Symbol

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Carole Cusack is a scholar of new religious movements and Western esotericism, and this is a peer reviewed journal article in Aries, a specialist academic journal for the study of esotericism, not a practitioner's guide to the Enneagram. Its method is historical, tracing the Enneagram symbol back through Gurdjieff's own teaching and asking what he actually meant by it, as distinct from the personality typing systems built on it later. Its strength is that separation, it treats the symbol's origin and its later popular use as two different questions and does not let one stand in for the other. As a single journal article rather than a book length study, its limit is depth, it establishes the historical line clearly but does not exhaustively cover every later offshoot of the system.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Carole Cusack's peer-reviewed journal article in Aries, a specialist academic journal for the study of esotericism, tracing the Enneagram symbol back through Gurdjieff's own teaching and separating it historically from the personality-typing system Oscar Ichazo built on it later.
Notes
Peer-reviewed history of the enneagram. Separates Gurdjieff's nine-pointed figure (presented to his Moscow and Petersburg groups in 1916, first printed in Ouspensky's In Search of the Miraculous, 1949) from the enneagram of personality built on it by Oscar Ichazo in Chile in the late 1960s and taught by Claudio Naranjo in California from 1970. The claimed ancient Sufi or desert-father descent is not supported by evidence.
Citation
Author
Carole M. Cusack
Publisher
Aries: Journal for the Study of Western Esotericism 20, no. 1 (Brill), pp. 31-54
Publication Year
2020
URL
https://brill.com/view/journals/arie/20/1/article-p31_2.xml?language=en
Source Type
peer-reviewed article
Claims Backed By This Source (251 claims)

This source backs 251 claims across the atlas. As facts: 218 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 9 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 19 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Enneagram Types, 152 claims: 134 well-attested, 9 popular myth - corrected, 9 general references.
  • Articles, 27 claims: 27 well-attested.
  • Enneagram Triads, 27 claims: 24 well-attested, 3 general references.
  • Categories, 20 claims: 18 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 9 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 holds, 3 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Organizations, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Secret Societies, 4 claims: 2 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

2

Secret Societies

Holds

3

Historical Figures

Secret Societies

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.