Rene Zandbergen's voynich.nu is the most established specialist reference site for the Voynich Manuscript, maintained for years by a researcher who has worked closely with the manuscript's holding library, Yale's Beinecke Rare Book Library, and who is a recognized figure in the small community of serious Voynich researchers. This particular page summarizes an independently peer reviewed result, the University of Arizona's 2009 AMS radiocarbon dating of the manuscript's parchment to 1404 to 1438 CE at 95 percent probability, rather than presenting an unreviewed personal theory. Its strength is that it accurately relays a genuine scientific dating result and is kept current as new findings appear. Its limit is that it is a personal specialist website rather than a peer reviewed publication itself, so the underlying radiocarbon study is the stronger citation for the dating claim specifically, while this page is the right source for tracking the state of Voynich scholarship generally.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Rene Zandbergen's voynich.nu is the most established specialist reference site for the Voynich Manuscript, maintained by a researcher who has worked closely with the manuscript's holding library, the middle tier reflecting that it accurately relays a genuine peer reviewed scientific dating result and is kept current, notwithstanding that it is a personal specialist website rather than a peer reviewed publication itself. NotesSummarises the 2009 University of Arizona AMS radiocarbon result: parchment 1404-1438 CE at 95% probability.
Citation
AuthorRene Zandbergen
Publishervoynich.nu
Publication Year2023
URLhttps://voynich.nu/origin.html
Source Typereference
Claims Backed By This Source (14 claims)
This source backs 14 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Artifacts & Relics, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.