Gregory Shaw is a scholar of Neoplatonism, and this academic book, published by Pennsylvania State University Press, examines the theurgic ritual philosophy of Iamblichus, the late antique Neoplatonist who argued that ritual practice, not philosophical contemplation alone, was necessary for the soul's ascent, working from Iamblichus's surviving texts and the wider Neoplatonist tradition responding to him. Its strength is taking Iamblichus's ritual theory seriously as coherent philosophy rather than dismissing it as a decline from more rationalist earlier Platonism, a reading that shifted later scholarly assessment of theurgy. Its limit is that it is a specialized study of one specific late antique philosopher's system, assuming background in Neoplatonist philosophy rather than introducing the tradition from a beginner's starting point.
Facts
Citation
AuthorGregory Shaw
PublisherPennsylvania State University Press
Publication Year1995
URLhttps://archive.org/details/theurgysoulneopl0000greg
Source Typeacademic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Gregory Shaw's Pennsylvania State University Press study of Iamblichus's Neoplatonic theurgy, the standard scholarly treatment of its philosophical justification. NotesStandard treatment of Iamblichean theurgy and its philosophical justification.
Claims Backed By This Source (53 claims)
This source backs 53 claims across the atlas. As facts: 40 well-attested. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 9 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Articles, 12 claims: 11 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Historical Figures, 10 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 holds, 2 general references.
- Doctrines, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Prayers, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 3 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Religions, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Esoteric Texts, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.