Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Tarot Decks

Tarot de Marseille

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1650 to 1760

The Tarot de Marseille is not one deck but a pattern: the standard arrangement of 78 cards that crystallised among the woodblock card-makers of northern Italy, Lyon and Marseille across the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. It has no single author, no first edition and no fixed year. Its landmarks are printers rather than authors (Jean Noblet in Paris around 1650, Jean Dodal in Lyon in the first decade of the eighteenth century, Nicolas Conver in Marseille in 1760), each cutting the same trumps in the same order under the same French titles. The name "Tarot de Marseille" is itself a twentieth-century label applied in France long after the pattern it describes, and the deck was made for a trick-taking card game before it was ever made for divination.

Two features matter when comparing it with the deck most modern readers learn from. First, the numbering: Marseille gives La Justice the number VIII and La Force the number XI. Rider-Waite-Smith reverses them, putting Strength at VIII and Justice at XI, so a trump number is not a reliable identifier across decks. Second, and more consequential, the pip cards are not scenic. The Five of Cups in a Marseille deck is five cups in an ornamental arrangement, not five cups and a mourner; the numbered minor cards carry no narrative image at all. Marseille reading therefore works from number and suit rather than from a picture, which is a genuinely different method, not a poorer version of the same one.

The trumps are titled in French and several names differ from their English equivalents: Le Mat (the Fool, and unnumbered rather than zero), Le Bateleur (the Magician, literally the mountebank), La Papesse, Le Pape, L'Amoureux in the singular, La Maison Dieu (the Tower), and a thirteenth trump that most Marseille printings leave untitled rather than name Death. The titles are given here in their plain forms, without the French accents.

The four suits are Batons, Coupes, Epees and Deniers (clubs, cups, swords and coins), the Latin suit signs the pattern inherited from Italy and Spain, against the Wands, Cups, Swords and Pentacles of the English-language decks. The pip cards carry the numeral and the suit signs and no title at all; the French names used for them here are the conventional ones rather than anything printed on the card. Two of the suits are drawn as interlace and two as counted objects. In Batons and Epees the signs cross one another in a lattice, the Epees blades curved into almond shapes, the Batons straight, and every odd number from three upward adds one further sign standing upright through the centre of the crossing, so the odd cards are structurally unlike the even ones. In Coupes and Deniers the signs do not touch: they are ranged in symmetrical groups with floral ornament in the spaces, the even numbers dividing evenly and the odd numbers setting one sign apart from the rest. Each of the four Aces is a single large emblem rather than a count, and each is unnumbered.

The sixteen court cards are the only figural cards among the fifty-six and the only minors that print a title on the face. The ranks are Valet, Cavalier, Reine and Roi, corresponding one for one with the Page, Knight, Queen and King of the English decks, and the woodblock spellings move about between printers: ROY for roi, REYNE for reine, BASTON for baton, COVPE with a V for the U, DEPEE run together.

How the pips are read is a real body of practice and a genuinely contested one. With no scene to interpret, meaning is built from the number and the suit together, most schools working from a decad in which each number from one to ten carries a fixed character that the suit then colours. The best-known modern statement of it is Alejandro Jodorowsky and Marianne Costa's, developed alongside Philippe Camoin's restoration of the Conver woodblocks; the older French cartomantic lists descending from Etteilla assign quite different values to the same cards, and the two do not reconcile. There is no single authoritative table, and the atlas does not supply one. What is not legitimate is reading a Marseille pip through the Rider-Waite-Smith picture of the same card: the mourner on the Five of Cups, the walker on the Eight of Cups and the pierced heart on the Three of Swords are Pamela Colman Smith's inventions of 1909 and carry no authority over a pattern that predates them by two centuries.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
1650 to 1760 1
Place of Origin
Northern Italy, Lyon and Marseille 1
Creator / Originator
A workshop pattern printed by many card-makers over two centuries 1
Creator / Originator
No single creator 1
Origin of the Name
A modern designation for a woodblock pattern much older than the name and never confined to Marseille 1
Deck
Cards in the Deck
78 1
Pip Cards
Non-scenic pips: the suit sign in geometric arrangement 1
Trump Numbering
Justice VIII, Strength XI (Marseille and Continental order) 1
Method
How the Cards Are Read
Read from number and suit together rather than from a scene, since the pip cards carry no narrative image. The best known modern statement is Alejandro Jodorowsky and Marianne Costa's, developed alongside Philippe Camoin's restoration of the Conver woodblocks; older French cartomantic lists descending from Etteilla assign different values to the same cards, and the two traditions do not reconcile. 1
Attributions
Publisher
No single publisher; the pattern was cut by many card-makers across two centuries. Its landmark printers are Jean Noblet in Paris around 1650, Jean Dodal in Lyon in the first decade of the eighteenth century, and Nicolas Conver in Marseille in 1760. 1
Tradition
Italo-French woodblock pattern 1
Cult
Attributes and Iconography
78 cards: 22 titled trumps in French, four suits, Batons, Coupes, Epees and Deniers, with non-scenic pip cards showing the suit signs in geometric arrangement, interlace lattices in Batons and Epees, symmetrical grouped counts with floral ornament in Coupes and Deniers, and 16 figural court cards, Valet, Cavalier, Reine and Roi, the only titled minor cards. 1
Learn More
The Marseille Pattern

The Tarot de Marseille is not a deck but a pattern: a standard arrangement of the seventy-eight cards, with a settled set of images, titles and numbering, that crystallised among the woodblock card-makers of northern Italy, Lyon and Marseille and was produced by many workshops over two centuries. Named surviving examples include those of Jean Noblet in Paris around 1650, Jean Dodal in Lyon around 1701 and Nicolas Conver in Marseille in 1760, the last of which became the model for most modern reproductions. The cards are printed from woodblocks and coloured through stencils in a limited palette, which gives the pattern its characteristic flat, bold look. The pips of the four suits are non-scenic: they show the suit signs arranged in geometric patterns, not illustrated scenes, which is the single clearest difference from the later English decks.

The Marseille pattern keeps the trump numbering the later Rider-Waite-Smith deck would depart from: Justice at VIII and Strength at XI, the order found in the earliest surviving Italian and French decks, which Waite reversed in 1909 to fit the Golden Dawn's own astrological correspondences. Modern practitioners of the pattern have also actively restored it: the artist Alejandro Jodorowsky and the cardmaker Philippe Camoin, a descendant of a historical Marseille card-making family, published a heavily researched restoration of the Nicolas Conver 1760 deck in 1997, correcting what they argued were centuries of accumulated printing errors and colour drift, a modern scholarly intervention into a pattern otherwise defined by anonymous workshop production over two centuries.

A Game Before It Was an Oracle

The historical point that the scholarly literature has established beyond dispute, and that most popular tarot writing ignores, is that the tarot was invented as a card game. Michael Dummett's The Game of Tarot (1980) and the work he did with Ronald Decker and Thierry Depaulis showed that the pack originated in fifteenth-century northern Italy as an ordinary playing-card deck with an added fifth suit of permanent trumps, that the game of tarocchi and its descendants have been played continuously in Italy, France, Switzerland, Austria and elsewhere ever since, and that no evidence exists for divinatory or esoteric use before the eighteenth century. The occult reading begins with Antoine Court de Gebelin in 1781, who asserted without evidence that the cards preserved an Egyptian book of Thoth, and with Etteilla, who published the first divinatory system in 1783. The Egyptian origin is a fabrication, and the deck it was attached to is this one.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Disciplines That Use This

Cartomancy is divination by cards of any kind; these are the decks the atlas holds.

Source A History of the Occult TarotRonald Decker and Michael Dummett
Tarot, Disciplines

The decks the atlas records in full.

Source A Wicked Pack of Cards: The Origins of the Occult TarotRonald Decker, Thierry Depaulis and Michael Dummett
Sources
1. The Game of Tarot: From Ferrara to Salt Lake City
Michael Dummett, Duckworth, 1980Part I, on the standard patterns and the regional trump ordersView the Source
Le Tarot de Marseille
Paul Marteau, B.-P. Grimaud, 1930the Marseille pattern and the Conver model
The Encyclopedia of Tarot, Volume I
Stuart R. Kaplan, U.S. Games Systems, 1978Volume I, the Tarot de Marseille and its eighteenth-century printingsView the Source
A Wicked Pack of Cards: The Origins of the Occult Tarot
Ronald Decker, Thierry Depaulis and Michael Dummett, St Martin's Press, 1996Chapters on Court de Gebelin and EtteillaView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.