Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Historical Periods

Mughal Empire

Also Known As Mogul Empire.

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Mughal Empire ruled most of the Indian subcontinent from 1526 to the mid nineteenth century as a Sunni Islamic dynasty governing a majority Hindu population, producing the era's most consequential experiment in interreligious court policy under Akbar and its most rigorous imposition of Islamic law under Aurangzeb.

Facts
Traditions
Principal Religious Traditions
Sunni Islam as the ruling house's own faith, the Hindu devotional and temple traditions of the great majority of subjects, and Sufi orders such as the Chishtiyya that moved between both court and countryside. 1
History
Notable Development
Akbar's Din-i-Ilahi, a court order of religious inquiry drawing on Islam, Hinduism, Zoroastrianism and Christianity, grew out of the interfaith debates he convened at the Ibadat Khana in Fatehpur Sikri. 2
Learn More
A Parliament of Prophets

Akbar, the third Mughal emperor, ruled a subcontinent in which his own Sunni Islam belonged to a small fraction of his subjects, and he built an unusually deliberate religious policy around that fact. In 1575 he opened the Ibadat Khana, a hall for religious debate at his new capital Fatehpur Sikri, first among Muslim scholars and then, as the debates grew heated and inconclusive, opened to Hindu pandits, Jain monks, Zoroastrian priests, and the Jesuit missionaries who had reached his court from Portuguese Goa.

Out of these debates Akbar drew Din-i-Ilahi, a court order of religious discipline rather than a rival religion meant for the wider population, combining elements of the traditions he had heard argued in front of him: a monotheism styled around light and the sun, vegetarianism drawn from Jain and Hindu practice, and a personal loyalty to the emperor himself as its central discipline. Membership never spread past a small circle of courtiers, and the order did not survive Akbar's death, but the debates that produced it left a lasting mark on Mughal policy. Akbar abolished the jizya, the poll tax non-Muslims paid under Islamic law, and ended a tax on Hindu pilgrims, moves his own court chronicler Abu'l Fazl recorded as deliberate acts of a ruler governing a majority he did not share a religion with. The reversal of both policies under his great-grandson Aurangzeb, a century later, is usually read against exactly this precedent.

The Tax That Came Back

Aurangzeb, who took the Mughal throne in 1658 after a war of succession against his more religiously eclectic brother Dara Shikoh, governed by a stricter reading of Islamic law than any Mughal emperor before him, and the contrast with Akbar's court a century earlier is usually read as deliberate. In 1679 he reimposed the jizya on non-Muslim subjects that Akbar had abolished, a levy the Encyclopaedia of Islam's account of Mughal religious policy treats as the clearest single marker of the reversal between the two reigns. Aurangzeb also ordered the destruction of a number of Hindu temples, including prominent sites at Varanasi and Mathura, framed in surviving court orders as responses to specific provocations rather than a blanket policy, though the scale and motivation remain debated among historians working from incomplete and sometimes contradictory Mughal court records.

At the same time Aurangzeb sponsored the Fatawa-i-Alamgiri, a vast compilation of Hanafi Islamic legal rulings assembled by a board of scholars at his direction, intended to give Mughal India a single authoritative code rather than leaving judges to rule from scattered and sometimes conflicting precedent. The work outlasted the empire that commissioned it and continued to be consulted in South Asian Islamic law long after Mughal rule ended, a longer institutional life than either the jizya's return or the temple destructions it is usually discussed alongside.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Hinduism, Religions
Islam, Religions
Sunni, Denominations

Originated In

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.