Numbers
23
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 1908 to 1965
Twenty-three is the ninth prime. Its symbolic reputation is almost entirely modern. Human cells carry twenty-three pairs of chromosomes and each gamete carries twenty-three, which supplies most of the number's biological mystique, and Psalm 23 is among the most widely memorised passages in the Hebrew Bible, though its number is an accident of the psalter's ordering rather than a symbolic choice. The 23 enigma, the conviction that the number recurs meaningfully in accidents and dates, originates with William S. Burroughs in Tangier around 1960 and was popularised by Robert Anton Wilson in The Illuminatus! Trilogy of 1975 and a Fortean Times article of 1977. Wilson himself presented it partly as a demonstration of how readily the mind finds pattern in noise. In digit-reduction numerology it reduces to 5.
Facts
Origins
Origin Period1908 to 1965 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Origin Period500 BCE to 300 CE 2Tradition: Pythagorean and Neopythagorean number lore Origin PeriodThe arithmological reading of the first numbers, one as source, two as division, four as justice, seven as virgin, ten as completion, reaches us through Platonic and Neopythagorean writers of the centuries after Plato. Burkert's finding is that it cannot be traced to Pythagoras himself, whose activity was religious rather than mathematical: the doctrines were credited backwards to him. 2 Origin PeriodThe system that gives a number a personality, and a person a number, was assembled in the United States in the first half of the twentieth century out of New Thought material. Balliett's The Philosophy of Numbers appeared in 1908; the chart positions, pinnacles and cycles were added by her successors over the next fifty years. 1 Place of OriginThe Greek world, and above all the Greek cities of southern Italy where the Pythagorean societies were established; the arithmological literature itself is later and largely eastern Mediterranean. 2Tradition: Pythagorean and Neopythagorean number lore Place of OriginThe United States, and specifically the New Thought circuit of the north-eastern seaboard; Balliett worked from Atlantic City. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Attributed Author / CompilerAttributed by the tradition to Pythagoras. Burkert's study is the standard demonstration that the number-doctrines carrying his name are the work of later hands, and that almost nothing in them can be shown to go back to the sixth century BCE. The attribution is recorded because it is what the tradition says, not because it holds. 2Tradition: Pythagorean and Neopythagorean number lore Attributed Author / CompilerMrs. L. Dow Balliett, who published the first version of the modern system in 1908 and to whom Dudley devotes a chapter. What later authors added, the pinnacles, the challenges, the cycles, the personal year, is theirs, and this atlas's own numerology-position entries cite four different authors between 1908 and 1965 for what is presented as one system. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Origin of the NamePythagorean numerology is a twentieth-century label. The system it names has no demonstrable descent from Pythagoras, from the Pythagorean societies, or from the ancient arithmological literature; the letter-value chart it rests on was drawn up in the United States after 1900. The name borrows a pedigree, the oldest move in the subject. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceSourced to the subject's own accountIn number theory twenty-three is the fifth Sophie Germain prime, a prime p for which two p plus one is also prime; twice twenty-three plus one is forty-seven, its corresponding safe prime. Two, five, eleven, twenty-three and forty-seven form a Cunningham chain of the first kind, each prime twice the one before it plus one, and it ends at forty-seven: twice forty-seven plus one is ninety-five, five times nineteen and not prime, so forty-seven itself is not a Sophie Germain prime. 3 4 Status
Standing as a Comparative CategoryLargely abandoned as a comparative category 1 Modern Numerology
Reduction in the Modern SystemThe modern system reduces every number above nine by adding its digits: 2 + 4 = 6. Whatever the system says of 24 it therefore says of 6, which its own description already states directly ("In digit-reduction numerology it reduces to 6"), because it holds no separate doctrine for the higher numbers. The stated exceptions are 11, 22 and 33, which it leaves unreduced and calls master numbers. 1 Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern UseNumerology has been sold since Balliett as a basis for decisions: which name to take, which date to marry on, which house number to buy. Dudley's survey of what numerologists sell is the standard critical account and its finding is blunt, numbers have power over minds, not over events. These entries record what the tradition says, not advice. 1 Learn More
The Shepherd Psalm and a Modern Obsession
Twenty-three is prime and reduces to five. Its best-known religious association is Psalm 23, the Lord is my shepherd, among the most memorised passages of the Hebrew Bible and a fixture of funeral liturgy across Christianity. The number carries little traditional symbolism beyond that, but it has acquired a striking modern one. The twenty-three enigma, the belief that the number recurs with uncanny frequency, was elaborated by the writer William S. Burroughs and popularised by Robert Anton Wilson in the Discordian and Illuminatus milieu of the 1960s and 1970s. It is a deliberate demonstration of a real cognitive tendency: once primed to notice a number, people find it everywhere, because coincidences are abundant and confirmation is selective. The enigma is best understood as a modern parable about pattern-seeking rather than a property of the number.
Balliett's 1908 chart reduces twenty-three to five, the same root Psalm 23's pastoral calm might seem to contradict, since five is read in the standard modern keyword list as change and restlessness rather than rest; Cheiro's 1926 Book of Numbers instead groups twenty-three among his so-called command numbers, alongside fourteen, crediting it with a magnetic, almost magical power over circumstance, a reading Florence Campbell's 1931 book and Juno Jordan's 1965 systematisation both carried into the standard modern chart.
Twenty-Three in Body and History
Two factual twenty-threes are often folded into the number's modern lore. Human beings carry twenty-three pairs of chromosomes, and each parent contributes twenty-three, a genuine fact of biology that post-dates any traditional numerology by millennia and so cannot have informed it. Suetonius reports that Julius Caesar was struck twenty-three times by the conspirators, though the physician Antistius judged only one wound fatal; the figure is frequently cited by enthusiasts of the twenty-three enigma. Neither has any bearing on ancient number symbolism, and their appeal lies precisely in the retrospective pattern-making the enigma was invented to illustrate. Stripped of the modern accretions, twenty-three remains a number whose one durable religious tie is to the shepherd psalm.
The twenty-three enigma's appeal to coincidence-seekers is itself a documented case study in a real cognitive bias, apophenia, the tendency to perceive meaningful pattern in random or unconnected data, a term coined by the psychiatrist Klaus Conrad in 1958 in an unrelated clinical context and later adopted by writers on the enigma to name exactly the mechanism Robert Anton Wilson was making fun of; the chromosome count and the Caesar wound count noted above are two of the enigma's favourite raw material for the same demonstration.
Correspondences & Relations
Numerology Meanings
Born on the twenty-third, the root is five and the compound is among the most favourably read in the older tables, sometimes called a number of protection. The gift is adaptability that lands well: the tradition assigns this day an unusual ability to be in the right place, and treats its holders as helped by circumstance more often than not.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Disciplines That Use This
The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.