Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Disciplines

Numerology

Divinatory Disciplines

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1890 to 1930

Numerology is the study of the hidden meaning of numbers and their supposed influence on character, destiny, and events. It treats numbers as symbolic essences rather than mere quantities, most often reducing names and birth dates to single digits, with master numbers such as eleven and twenty-two left unreduced. In the widespread Pythagorean system letters are assigned values one through nine, yielding core figures such as the Life Path from the birth date and the Expression and Soul Urge from the name; the older Hebrew practice of gematria and the Chaldean method assign values differently. Each number one through nine bears a settled character, from the leadership of one to the completion of nine, which the practitioner weaves into a portrait or forecast. Rooted in ancient Greek, Hebrew, and Babylonian thought, numerology recurs across mysticism, sacred architecture, and scripture wherever numbers are held to encode a deeper order.

Facts
Debunked
Attributed Author / Compiler
No surviving Pythagorean or Neopythagorean text teaches the modern name-and-birthdate system 3
Wouter J. Hanegraaff's Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture, Cambridge University Press, 2012, examines the self-legitimising genealogies Western esoteric movements have constructed since the Renaissance, among them modern numerology's ascription to Pythagoras of Samos. Hanegraaff's method is textual historical: comparing the surviving ancient Pythagorean and Neopythagorean sources, which concern mathematical and cosmological ratio rather than personal name-and-birthdate calculation, against the actual content of the numerology taught today. No ancient text teaches the modern system, which is why Hanegraaff treats the Pythagorean pedigree as part of the genealogy the tradition built for itself rather than as a documented historical transmission, dating the practice as taught now to a nineteenth and twentieth century construction.
Attributed Author / Compiler
The Pythagorean pedigree is part of the genealogy Western esotericism constructed for itself, and the practice as taught today is a nineteenth- and twentieth-century construction 3
Wouter J. Hanegraaff's Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture, Cambridge University Press, 2012, examines the self-legitimising genealogies Western esoteric movements have constructed since the Renaissance, among them modern numerology's ascription to Pythagoras of Samos. Hanegraaff's method is textual historical: comparing the surviving ancient Pythagorean and Neopythagorean sources, which concern mathematical and cosmological ratio rather than personal name-and-birthdate calculation, against the actual content of the numerology taught today. No ancient text teaches the modern system, which is why Hanegraaff treats the Pythagorean pedigree as part of the genealogy the tradition built for itself rather than as a documented historical transmission, dating the practice as taught now to a nineteenth and twentieth century construction.
Attributed Author / Compiler
Traditionally ascribed to Pythagoras of Samos 3
Wouter J. Hanegraaff's Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture, Cambridge University Press, 2012, examines the self-legitimising genealogies Western esoteric movements have constructed since the Renaissance, among them modern numerology's ascription to Pythagoras of Samos. Hanegraaff's method is textual historical: comparing the surviving ancient Pythagorean and Neopythagorean sources, which concern mathematical and cosmological ratio rather than personal name-and-birthdate calculation, against the actual content of the numerology taught today. No ancient text teaches the modern system, which is why Hanegraaff treats the Pythagorean pedigree as part of the genealogy the tradition built for itself rather than as a documented historical transmission, dating the practice as taught now to a nineteenth and twentieth century construction.
Origins
Origin Period
1890 to 1930 1Tradition: Cheiro's popular numerology (1890s)
Place of OriginSourced to the subject's own account
United States 2Tradition: Florence Campbell's popular numerology (1931)
Status
Status Today
Living tradition, practised today 3
Learn More
The Method, and the Arithmetic It Uses

Numerology treats numbers as characters rather than quantities, and its procedure is fixed enough to describe exactly.

The Life Path comes from the birth date: the digits are added and reduced by repeated addition until a single figure remains, with 11, 22 and in some schools 33 held back as master numbers and left unreduced. The name yields further figures. In the system generally called Pythagorean, the letters A to I take the values 1 to 9, J to R repeat 1 to 9, and S to Z run 1 to 8. All the letters of a name give the Expression; the vowels give the Soul Urge; the consonants give the Personality.

Each digit then carries a settled character. One leads, two mediates, three communicates, four builds, five seeks change, six nurtures, seven withdraws and enquires, eight commands material affairs, nine completes and gives away. The practitioner combines the figures into a portrait, and derives personal year numbers from the current year for forecasting.

Two other systems are in use. Hebrew gematria assigns the values the Hebrew alphabet actually carries, from aleph at 1 to tav at 400, and is a genuine and very old feature of Jewish textual interpretation. Greek isopsephy does the same for the Greek alphabet. Both differ fundamentally from the modern method in that they operate on the alphabet's own numerals rather than on an assigned chart.

The point most worth noticing about the Pythagorean chart is that it fits the Latin alphabet and works in no other. The number it produces for a name is therefore a property of a modern spelling in a particular script, which is a constraint any account of the method has to accommodate.

Where the Names Come from, and What They Are Worth

Both of the labels attached to modern numerology assert a lineage, and neither lineage is documented. This is not a marginal quibble; it is the central historical fact about the discipline.

Pythagoras wrote nothing, no text by him was known even in antiquity, and the detailed accounts of his teaching come from Neoplatonist biographers writing seven or eight centuries after his death with a case to make. What can be attributed to him with reasonable confidence is the transmigration of souls and the founding of a community with a rule of life. The Pythagoreans certainly did hold that number was fundamental to reality, and that idea is genuinely theirs. But nothing resembling the digit-reduction of names and birth dates is attributed to Pythagoras or to any Pythagorean by any ancient source. The label is a borrowing of authority rather than a line of descent.

What the modern system actually descends from is documented and recent. L. Dow Balliett published The Philosophy of Numbers in 1908 in the United States, drawing on New Thought and on theosophical ideas about vibration; Florence Campbell and Juno Jordan systematised and popularised it across the following decades. The apparatus of Life Path, Expression and Soul Urge is an American product of the twentieth century, roughly a hundred and twenty years old.

Chaldean numerology, which uses a different letter chart and reserves 9 as sacred, is credited to Cheiro, the stage name of William John Warner, who published it in the 1920s and asserted a Babylonian origin. No documented Babylonian lineage exists for it. It is Cheiro's assertion, and it should be described as such.

None of this makes the practice worthless to those who use it. It does mean that its antiquity is a marketing claim rather than a historical one, and the distinction is worth keeping.

What Numerologists Hold, and Where They Disagree

Numerologists hold that a number attached to a person, through a date that was not chosen or a name that mostly was not, expresses something durable about temperament and about the shape of a life. Almost nobody in the practice offers a mechanism, and the more careful practitioners describe the numbers as a symbolic vocabulary for self-examination rather than as a causal influence.

The disagreements inside the practice are real and are not resolved by any authority, because there is none.

Which name to use is the first. Birth certificate name, current legal name, married name, chosen name and nickname all yield different figures, and schools differ over which is definitive; some read several and treat the differences as meaningful, which is a convenient position and is acknowledged as such by critics inside the field.

Which chart to use is the second. Pythagorean and Chaldean assignments give different values for the same letters, and both are in wide commercial use. There is no principled way to choose between them.

Master numbers are the third: whether 11, 22 and 33 should be held back at all, and whether the practice of doing so is old or was introduced with the modern system.

And transliteration is the fourth, and the most awkward. A name written in Arabic, Devanagari, Cyrillic, Hebrew or Chinese has no letters in the chart at all, and the practice's answer is to romanise, which means the number depends on a transliteration convention.

None of these are hidden. They are argued about in the numerological literature itself, and a practitioner who says which system they are using and why is being straightforward about a genuinely unsettled method.

Angel Numbers, Karmic Debt, and the Recent Additions

Some of the most visible numerological material in circulation today is also the newest, and it is worth separating from the apparatus of Life Path, Expression and Soul Urge, which is itself only about a century old.

Angel numbers are repeating or patterned sequences noticed in ordinary life: 111, 444, 1234, or a clock caught at 11:11. They are read as messages from angels or guides. Unlike everything else in numerology, nothing is calculated. The number is not derived from a person, it is encountered, and its meaning comes from a published table rather than from any operation on a name or a date. This is a twenty-first-century practice. Its standardised form is owed principally to Doreen Virtue, whose Angel Numbers appeared in 2005 after earlier work in the same vein, and it spread very widely indeed through social media during the 2010s. Virtue subsequently repudiated her entire New Age output after converting to evangelical Christianity, which is a fact about the practice's history that those now promoting it rarely mention. The underlying observation, that people do notice repeating digits, has a well-understood explanation that requires no angels: the sequences noticed are counted and remembered, and the far larger number of unremarkable clock faces and receipts is not.

Karmic debt numbers, 13, 14, 16 and 19, appearing as a two-digit sum before a final reduction, are read as difficulties carried over from a previous life. The idea is a twentieth-century American graft of Indian karma onto a system that originally had no such concept, and the particular four numbers are not attested in any older source. It also rests on a technical choice rather than on anything about the numbers: a practitioner who reduces in a single step never sees a compound figure at all, and so never finds a debt in a chart where a colleague using the other method would find one.

Personal Year and Universal Year numbers are the forecasting side of the system, and they stand on the same footing as the Pinnacles, twentieth-century American technique, of documented recency, generally taught as though it were an ancient art.

None of this makes the practice illegitimate to those who use it, and the atlas does not treat recency as disqualifying. It does mean that a page presenting angel numbers as ancient wisdom is making a claim that is both false and easy to check, and that the date should be given.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Wrote Your Days Are Numbered (1931), an early complete textbook presentation of Pythagorean numerology, working independently of the Balliett-Jordan teaching lineage.

Source Your Days Are NumberedFlorence Campbell

Her teaching on the vibration of names and numbers fed the popular numerology of the following decades.

Founded the California Institute of Numerical Research and formalized the Pinnacles, Challenges and Planes of Expression now standard in Pythagorean numerology.

Source Numerology: The Romance in Your NameJuno Jordan

Her 1908 Philosophy of Numbers set the tone and color system and the unreduced master numbers that the modern Pythagorean numerology practiced under this Discipline still uses.

The statement of the number system that modern Western numerology largely descends from.

Belongs to Tradition

Greek letters served as numerals, so isopsephy, the same technique as gematria, was available and used in inscriptions, oracles and graffiti, while the Pythagorean current gave number a religious weight beyond the merely notational.

Source Cheiro's Book of NumbersCheiro (William John Warner)

The Bahai Faith carries a marked numerical symbolism inherited from its Babi origins: the value nineteen governs the calendar of nineteen months of nineteen days, and the Bab's own title is derived by abjad reckoning.

Source Cheiro's Book of NumbersCheiro (William John Warner)

Christian tradition reads the numbers of scripture as meaningful, the seven of completion, the forty of trial, the twelve of tribes and apostles, and has argued for centuries over the number of the beast in Revelation; systematic numerology as fortune-telling has no church standing.

Source Cheiro's Book of NumbersCheiro (William John Warner)
Gnosticism, Religions

Gnostic cosmologies count their emanations precisely, the Valentinian thirty aeons in ordered pairs and the seven planetary archons, and treat the numbers as structural rather than decorative; the divine names in the texts are often built for their numerical value.

Source Cheiro's Book of NumbersCheiro (William John Warner)
Hermeticism, Religions

Hermetic teaching treats number as one of the correspondences by which the above and the below answer to one another, so the seven planets, four elements and twelve signs supply a numerical grammar that ties the whole system together.

Source Cheiro's Book of NumbersCheiro (William John Warner)
Islam, Religions

Abjad reckoning assigns numerical values to the Arabic letters and has been used for chronograms, for the mysterious letters that open certain suras, and in the lettrist speculation of the Sufi and Hurufi traditions; the jurists have been unfriendly to divinatory use.

Source Cheiro's Book of NumbersCheiro (William John Warner)
Judaism, Religions

Gematria, the reckoning of Hebrew letters as numbers so that words of equal value are read as connected, is a standard tool of rabbinic interpretation and of Kabbalah, used to draw meaning out of the text rather than to profile a person's character.

Source Cheiro's Book of NumbersCheiro (William John Warner)

Neoplatonism makes number the first thing to proceed from the One and so the rung by which the soul ascends back to it, which is the philosophical basis on which the later tradition claims number to be more than quantity.

Source Cheiro's Book of NumbersCheiro (William John Warner)

Pythagoreanism is where the claim originates: that number is the principle of things, that the tetractys of the first four numbers holds the cosmos, and that a numerical ratio underlies the concords of music. Numerology's own tradition names Pythagoras as its father.

Source Cheiro's Book of NumbersCheiro (William John Warner)

Element Of

Bektashi Order, Religious Orders

Bektashi thought absorbed the letter and number mysticism of the Hurufi movement in the fifteenth century, and Hurufi texts went on circulating in the order's lodges long after the movement itself was suppressed.

Chabad teaching uses gematria freely as an interpretive method within its Kabbalistic frame.

Source Encyclopaedia Judaica, 2nd editionMichael Berenbaum and Fred Skolnik (eds.)

Gematria, the reckoning of the numerical value of the Hebrew letters, is a standard tool of Hasidic homiletics and appears constantly in its published teaching.

Source Encyclopaedia Judaica, 2nd editionMichael Berenbaum and Fred Skolnik (eds.)
Sufism, Denominations

The science of the letters, in which the letters of the divine names are treated as bearing power, circulated widely in Sufi milieux without being a discipline any order requires.

Source The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd editionP. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel and W. P. Heinrichs (eds.)

Related To

The numbers were produced by digit reduction, which is a numerological operation rather than an acoustic one.

Works With

0, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
1, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
10, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
100, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
101, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
102, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
103, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
104, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
105, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
106, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
107, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
108, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
109, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
11, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
110, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
111, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
112, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
113, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
114, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
115, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
116, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
117, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
118, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
12, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
13, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
14, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
15, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
16, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
17, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
18, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
19, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
2, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
20, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
21, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
22, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
23, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
24, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
25, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
26, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
27, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
28, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
29, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
3, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
30, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
31, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
32, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
33, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
34, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
35, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
36, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
37, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
38, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
39, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
4, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
40, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
41, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
42, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
43, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
44, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
45, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
46, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
47, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
48, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
49, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
5, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
50, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
51, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
52, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
53, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
54, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
55, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
56, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
57, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
58, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
59, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
6, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
60, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
61, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
62, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
63, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
64, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
65, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
66, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
67, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
68, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
69, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
7, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
70, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
71, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
72, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
73, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
74, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
75, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
76, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
77, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
78, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
79, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
8, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
80, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
81, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
82, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
83, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
84, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
85, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
86, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
87, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
88, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
89, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
9, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
90, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
91, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
92, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
93, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
94, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
95, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
96, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
97, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
98, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley
99, Numbers

The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.

Source Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras WroughtUnderwood Dudley

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

The chart positions a numerological reading is built from, as distinct from the numbers themselves.

Sources
1. New Age Religion and Western Culture: Esotericism in the Mirror of Secular Thought
Wouter J. Hanegraaff, Brill, 1996on the formation of the popular occult sciences and their New Age transmissionView the Source
2. Your Days Are Numbered
Florence Campbell, The Gateway, 1931
3. Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture
Wouter J. Hanegraaff, Cambridge University Press, 2012on the Pythagorean and prisca theologia genealogies of Western esotericism
The Philosophy of Numbers: Their Tones and Colors
L. Dow Balliett, L. N. Fowler, 1908The 1908 edition
Quote, The 1908 edition
The digit-reduction system for names and birth dates was assembled in the United States in the first decade of the twentieth century.
Numerology: The Romance in Your Name
Juno Jordan, DeVorss, 1965On Life Path, Expression and Soul Urge
Quote, On Life Path, Expression and Soul Urge
The apparatus in general use was systematised by Jordan and her contemporaries.
View the Source
Cheiro's Book of Numbers
Cheiro (William John Warner), Herbert Jenkins, 1926On the Chaldean chart
Quote, On the Chaldean chart
The Chaldean system and its claimed Babylonian origin are Cheiro's assertion; no documented Babylonian lineage exists for it.
View the Source
Weisheit und Wissenschaft: Studien zu Pythagoras, Philolaos und Platon (Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism)
Walter Burkert, Harvard University Press, 1962On the early evidence for Pythagoras
Quote, On the early evidence for Pythagoras
Almost nothing survives from Pythagoras, and nothing resembling digit reduction is attributed to him by any ancient source.
View the Source
Angel Numbers
Doreen Virtue, Hay House, 2005Promoter source for the standardised angel-number tables
Numerology: Or, What Pythagoras Wrought
Underwood Dudley, Mathematical Association of America (Spectrum series), 1997View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.