Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Wouter J. Hanegraaff's study examines directly how esoteric and occult material came to be studied as an academic field at all, naming specific historiographical traps, such as scholars either dismissing the material outright or treating it uncritically as the tradition's own participants would, that earlier academic treatments fell into. That self critical examination of the field's own history, rather than a simple survey of esoteric content, is the book's real contribution. This record has not independently traced further scholarly response to Hanegraaff's specific argument. Use it for how esoteric material came to be studied academically and for the historiographical pitfalls involved in studying it.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Wouter Hanegraaff's study examining how esoteric and occult material came to be studied as an academic field at all, naming specific historiographical traps earlier academic treatments fell into rather than offering a simple survey of esoteric content.
Notes
On how this material came to be studied, and on the historiographical traps in it.
Citation
Author
Wouter J. Hanegraaff
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Publication Year
2012
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (172 claims)

This source backs 172 claims across the atlas. As facts: 44 well-attested, 3 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 68 holds. Plus 57 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Disciplines, 72 claims: 6 well-attested, 3 popular myth - corrected, 61 holds, 2 general references.
  • Incense, 25 claims: 7 holds, 18 general references.
  • Categories, 13 claims: 9 well-attested, 4 general references.
  • Subcategories, 12 claims: 9 well-attested, 3 general references.
  • Articles, 10 claims: 10 well-attested.
  • Esoteric Texts, 10 claims: 3 well-attested, 7 general references.
  • Alchemical Operations, 7 claims: 7 general references.
  • Hermetic Principles, 7 claims: 7 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Magical Weapons, 5 claims: 5 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 3 claims: 3 general references.
  • Religions, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Popular myth - corrected

3

Disciplines

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.