Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Manichaeism in the Later Roman Empire and Medieval China, 2nd edition

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Samuel Lieu is a historian of Manichaeism, and this academic monograph, now in its second edition from Mohr Siebeck, is one of the standard scholarly treatments tracing Manichaeism's spread from its origins into the later Roman Empire and separately into medieval China, using primary sources in multiple languages including Chinese, Greek, Latin and Iranian material. Its strength is exactly that comparative reach across two very different regions where Manichaeism survived under different pressures, drawing on original documents rather than later secondhand polemics against it. Because a second edition exists, it reflects updated scholarship correcting or extending the first. Its limit is that Manichean primary sources are fragmentary and often survive only through hostile critics, a constraint the book is explicit about rather than concealing.

Facts
Citation
Author
Samuel N. C. Lieu
Publisher
Mohr Siebeck
Publication Year
1992
Source Type
Monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Samuel Lieu's standard scholarly history of the Manichaean church from Mani to its Chinese survival, published by Mohr Siebeck.
Notes
The standard history of the Manichaean church from Mani to its Chinese survival.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

China, Countries

This source names China directly: "Empire and separately into medieval China, using primary sources in multiple languages including Chinese, Greek, Latin and Iranian material."

Claims Backed By This Source (88 claims)

This source backs 88 claims across the atlas. As facts: 62 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 8 holds. Plus 17 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Doctrines, 20 claims: 13 well-attested, 2 holds, 5 general references.
  • Articles, 18 claims: 15 well-attested, 3 general references.
  • Religions, 13 claims: 12 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Scriptures & Texts, 11 claims: 6 well-attested, 4 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Historical Figures, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Pantheons, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Cities, 3 claims: 3 general references.
  • Languages, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Regions, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1

Pantheons

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.