Younger Futhark Runes
Úr
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 1200 to 1300
Rune 2 of the sixteen-rune Younger Futhark, the reduced row used across Viking-age Scandinavia and on the great majority of surviving runestones; sound value u. The two poems read this rune quite differently: the Norwegian poem treats it as dross or slag from poorly smelted iron, while the Icelandic poem instead reads it as drizzle or rain, a genuine divergence in subject rather than only in imagery built on a shared theme.
Facts
Origins
Origin Period1200 to 1300 2Tradition: Norwegian Rune Poem Origin Period1400 to 1500 2Tradition: Icelandic Rune Poem Origin Period700 to 1200 CE 1Tradition: Younger Futhark inscriptions in Scandinavia Place of OriginScandinavia, where the reduced sixteen-rune row replaced the Elder Futhark through the eighth century and became the script of the Viking age 1 Place of OriginThe two poems that give the runes their names are Norwegian and Icelandic, so the names come from the western Norse area rather than from Sweden and Denmark, where most surviving runestones stand 3 Origin of the NameOld Norse ur, about which the two poems do not agree: the Norwegian poem takes it as dross or slag from badly smelted iron, the Icelandic poem as drizzle. Both are real Norse words of that shape. The Elder Futhark ancestor of the rune meant the aurochs, and neither poem preserves that. 2 Attributions
Associated Sound Disputed
Meaning in the Attesting SourceBruce Dickins's edition and translation Runic and Heroic Poems of the Old Teutonic Peoples (Cambridge University Press, 1915) prints the two surviving rune poems that gloss Ur, the second rune of the sixteen rune Younger Futhark used across Viking age Scandinavia: the Norwegian poem reads it as dross, the slag left over from poorly smelted iron, while the Icelandic poem instead reads the same rune as drizzle or rain, a genuine divergence in subject rather than two images built on one shared idea. 2 Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern UseThis sixteen-rune row, and not the Elder Futhark, is the base from which Guido von List built the eighteen-character Armanen set in 1902, claiming it from the eighteen spells of the Havamal. The Armanen characters and their readings were taken up in Nazi Germany and remain in far-right use. They are a modern construction and no Armanen reading is attested for this rune. 4 Learn More
Ur, Where the Two Poems Genuinely Disagree
Ur is the clearest case among the sixteen Younger Futhark runes where the Norwegian and Icelandic poems do not simply develop a shared theme differently but read the rune's actual subject as two different things entirely: the Norwegian poem treats ur as dross or slag, the waste material left over from smelting poor quality iron, while the Icelandic poem instead reads the same rune as drizzle or light rain, a genuinely separate natural phenomenon with no obvious conceptual link to the Norwegian reading beyond the two sharing a name and a sound. This divergence is worth stating plainly rather than smoothing over, since it shows that even among the two closest surviving witnesses to the Younger Futhark's own meaning, composed only a few centuries apart within the same broad Old Norse literary culture, no single fixed reading for every rune had been preserved by the time either poem was written down, the tradition already carrying more than one live interpretation for at least this sign. Dickins' 1915 edition presents both readings side by side without attempting to resolve them into one, the correct scholarly posture given that nothing in the surviving evidence establishes which, if either, represents an older or more original sense of the rune.
Ur and the Sixteen-Rune Reduction
Ur is the second of the sixteen Younger Futhark runes, descending from Uruz, the Elder Futhark's own second rune, its name and general sound value u carried forward across the reduction from twenty four to sixteen signs even where, as the poems themselves show, the specific meaning attached to the name had already begun to drift by the time of the surviving medieval commentary.
The Younger Futhark's sixteen signs had to cover the full vowel and consonant inventory of Old Norse, a language that had itself undergone substantial sound change since the Elder Futhark's original design, so Ur, like several of the row's other vowel signs, came to represent more than one distinct sound in practice, an underspecification runologists treat as a defining structural feature of the whole Younger Futhark system rather than a flaw, since context and a reader's own knowledge of the language filled in what the limited sign inventory left ambiguous. Michael Barnes' handbook treats this deliberate economy, fewer signs than the language strictly needed, as a genuine puzzle in runic scholarship, since the reduction happened even as the Old Norse sound system was if anything growing more complex, the opposite of what a simple wish for clearer writing would predict.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Attested In
Contained In
One of the sixteen characters of the Younger Futhark.
Derived From
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.