Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Runes: A Handbook

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This is a scholarly handbook of runic writing built from the documented epigraphic corpus itself, the several thousand surviving runic inscriptions from Scandinavia and the British Isles, rather than from later reconstructions of what runes might have meant. Its author is a specialist in runology, the discipline that reads and dates these inscriptions directly. What the atlas can verify about its standing is its continued use as a working reference in the field rather than a documented history of specific corrections to earlier editions, which this record has not independently traced. It is the right source for the historical form, use and decipherment of runic writing, grounded in inscriptions a reader could in principle go and check. It is not a source on the divinatory or magical use of runes claimed by modern practitioners, a separate and much later development that needs its own separate source rather than being read back into the epigraphic record.

Facts
Citation
Author
Michael P. Barnes
Publisher
The Boydell Press
Publication Year
2012
URL
https://www.abebooks.com/9781843837787/Runes-Handbook-Barnes-Michael-P-1843837781/plp
Source Type
academic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A standard scholarly handbook of runic writing and inscriptions, published by an academic press specialising in medieval studies.
Notes
Standard scholarly handbook of runic writing and inscriptions.
Claims Backed By This Source (761 claims)

This source backs 761 claims across the atlas. As facts: 597 well-attested, 2 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 57 holds. Plus 105 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Runes, 264 claims: 240 well-attested, 24 general references.
  • Younger Futhark Runes, 160 claims: 112 well-attested, 32 holds, 16 general references.
  • Articles, 95 claims: 91 well-attested, 4 general references.
  • Armanen Runes, 90 claims: 72 well-attested, 18 general references.
  • Anglo-Saxon Futhorc Runes, 58 claims: 29 well-attested, 29 general references.
  • Rune Aetts, 39 claims: 12 well-attested, 24 holds, 3 general references.
  • Categories, 16 claims: 14 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Rituals, 13 claims: 10 well-attested, 2 popular myth - corrected, 1 general references.
  • Scripts & Magical Alphabets, 11 claims: 7 well-attested, 4 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Disciplines, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Esoteric Texts, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Regions, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Popular myth - corrected

2
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.