Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Esoteric Texts

Picatrix (Ghayat al-Hakim)

Also Known As Picatrix
Astrological and Divinatory Texts

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

A vast Arabic manual of astral and talismanic magic teaching how to draw down the spiritual virtues of the planets and fixed stars into images, suffumigations, and rituals timed to the heavens. It blends Neoplatonic cosmology, Hermetic philosophy, and practical recipes for petitioning planetary spirits. It is among the most influential and comprehensive medieval works of learned magic.

Facts
Disputed
Attributed Author / Compiler
Attributed to Maslama al-Majriti, the Andalusi mathematician and astronomer, though the ascription has been challenged in favour of Maslama ibn Qasim al-Qurtubi, a different Andalusi scholar of overlapping name and period, and recent editors have followed the second identification. 1
The book has long circulated under the name of Maslama al-Majriti, the Andalusi mathematician and astronomer who died in the early eleventh century. That ascription has been challenged in favour of Maslama ibn Qasim al-Qurtubi, a different Andalusi scholar of overlapping name and period with a documented interest in the occult sciences, and recent editors have followed the second identification. The atlas records the attribution as it circulates and treats neither as settled.
Text
Literary Form
Grimoire / manual of magical operations 1
Attributions
Tradition
Astral Magic 1
Scholarship and Forensics
Scholarly Note
Historians of magic read its systematic linking of planetary powers to images, materials and rites as one of the most complete surviving statements of astral magic theory from the medieval Islamic world, later a major influence on Renaissance writers who encountered it in Latin. 1
Origins
Era of Composition
1000 to 1050 1
Language
Classical Arabic 1
Discipline
Ceremonial Magick 1
Transmission
Manuscript Tradition
No Arabic manuscript predating the thirteenth century survives. The fullest early textual witness is instead the Latin translation commissioned for Alfonso X of Castile in the 1250s, the route by which the work reached Latin Christendom. 1
Learn More
The Arabic Book That Europe Read in Latin and Misfiled

The Latin title by which this work is known in Europe is a corruption, probably of an Arabic name, and it has stuck so thoroughly that the original title is the one that needs introducing. In Arabic it is the Ghayat al-Hakim, the Goal of the Sage, and it is the most substantial surviving manual of astral magic from the medieval Islamic world.

David Pingree did the source-critical work. The compilation, put together in al-Andalus in roughly the tenth or eleventh century, draws on Harranian Sabian planetary religion, on Greek and Hellenistic astrological material transmitted through Arabic, on Indian sources, and on the Arabic hermetica. It is a synthesis of an already long tradition rather than a single author's system, and its attribution to the mathematician al-Majriti is not sustainable.

It entered Europe by a specific and documented route. It was translated into Castilian at the court of Alfonso X of Castile in the thirteenth century, as part of the same programme of translation that produced that court's astronomical tables, and a Latin version followed from the Castilian. This is why the book is in European libraries at all, and why Renaissance magicians could read it.

Its practical importance is that it supplies the operative half of a system whose theoretical half came from the Hermetic and Neoplatonic texts. The talismanic magic of the Renaissance, images engraved in specific metals at astrologically elected moments, with suffumigations and invocations matched to a planet, is substantially this book's procedure. Ficino's own cautious astral medicine draws on it. Agrippa uses it. Much of the material in later grimoires descends from it, generally without attribution.

There is a point about intellectual geography worth stating plainly. The standard narrative of Western esotericism runs from Egypt through Greece to Renaissance Italy, and this book does not fit that line. It is an Arabic work, compiled in Muslim Spain, drawing on Syrian, Indian and Greek sources, and it reached Europe because a Castilian king paid for translations. Removing it from the account would leave the practical tradition without its main technical source.

A Practical Manual, and Why It Was Feared

The Picatrix is long, roughly four hundred pages in modern editions, and it is a working manual rather than a treatise. Its four books set out how to make astral talismans: what image to engrave, in what material, at what astrological moment, with what suffumigation and what invocation, in order to draw down the power of a planet or a star for a stated purpose. Those purposes are entirely practical and often unedifying, running to love, wealth, the ruin of an enemy and the destruction of a city.

It is also a philosophical work, and the two halves sit awkwardly together. The theoretical passages present a Neoplatonic cosmology in which the operator works with the natural sympathies of a living universe; the operative passages describe rites involving blood, unpleasant ingredients and prayers to planetary spirits that are hard to read as anything but address to a god.

That combination made it the most compromising book a Renaissance scholar could own. It circulated widely in manuscript and was not printed, which is itself informative: the Latin version, made for Alfonso X of Castile in the thirteenth century, was too useful to destroy and too dangerous to publish.

Modern scholarship has largely detached the work from al-Majriti, the Andalusian mathematician whose name it carries, and treats the Arabic original as an eleventh century compilation drawing on much older Hellenistic and Harranian material.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Attributed To

Why this is disputed. The Arabic Ghayat al-Hakim, later known in Latin as the Picatrix, is traditionally ascribed to the tenth century Andalusian astronomer Maslama al-Majriti, an attribution recorded by the historian Ibn Khaldun. The work's own introduction states it was completed around 959 CE and names an earlier book finished five years before that, a chronology that would place al-Majriti, who died between 1005 and 1008, only a small child when the writing began, and no surviving biography of him mentions this work at all. Modern scholars including Maribel Fierro regard the true author as a different, similarly named figure, Maslama al-Qurtubi.

Originates in Language

Sources
1. Grimoires: A History of Magic Books
Owen Davies, Oxford University Press, 2009from the text's own catalogue recordView the Source
Some of the Sources of the Ghayat al-hakim
David Pingree, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 1980the identification of the work's Arabic and Hellenistic sources
Batinism in Al-Andalus: Maslama b. Qasim al-Qurtubi, Author of the Rutbat al-Hakim and the Ghayat al-Hakim (Picatrix)
Maribel Fierro, Studia Islamica, number 84, 1996
Open Questions (1 open question)
Which Maslama wrote the Ghayat al-Hakim?

The Picatrix has long circulated under the name of Maslama al-Majriti, the Andalusi mathematician and astronomer who died in the early eleventh century. The ascription has been challenged in favour of Maslama ibn Qasim al-Qurtubi, a different Andalusi scholar of overlapping name and period with a documented interest in the occult sciences. The atlas records the attribution as it circulates and does not treat either identification as settled.

What would resolve this A comparative study of the Arabic Ghayat against the securely attributed works of each candidate, on vocabulary, sources cited and technical practice, or a manuscript colophon earlier than the ones currently known.
Classical Arabic philology and the history of science in al-Andalus.Dan Attrell and David Porreca (trans.), Picatrix: A Medieval Treatise on Astral Magic
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.