Numbers
55
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 1908 to 1965
Fifty-five is triangular, the sum of 1 through 10, and also a Fibonacci number, one of only four numbers that are both, the others being 1, 3 and 21. It equals 5 x 11. The triangular property is the interesting one: the tetractys of Pythagorean tradition is the triangle of ten points, and fifty-five is the sum of the first ten counting numbers, which is why it recurs in arithmetical writing about the decad. Independent religious symbolism is thin. In digit-reduction numerology it reduces to 1.
Facts
Origins
Origin Period Origin Period Origin PeriodThe arithmological reading of the first numbers, one as source, two as division, four as justice, seven as virgin, ten as completion, reaches us through Platonic and Neopythagorean writers of the centuries after Plato. Burkert's finding is that it cannot be traced to Pythagoras himself, whose activity was religious rather than mathematical: the doctrines were credited backwards to him. 2Tradition: Pythagorean and Neopythagorean number lore Origin PeriodThe system that gives a number a personality, and a person a number, was assembled in the United States in the first half of the twentieth century out of New Thought material. Balliett's The Philosophy of Numbers appeared in 1908; the chart positions, pinnacles and cycles were added by her successors over the next fifty years. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Place of OriginThe Greek world, and above all the Greek cities of southern Italy where the Pythagorean societies were established; the arithmological literature itself is later and largely eastern Mediterranean. 2Tradition: Pythagorean and Neopythagorean number lore Place of OriginThe United States, and specifically the New Thought circuit of the north-eastern seaboard; Balliett worked from Atlantic City. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Attributed Author / CompilerAttributed by the tradition to Pythagoras. Burkert's study is the standard demonstration that the number-doctrines carrying his name are the work of later hands, and that almost nothing in them can be shown to go back to the sixth century BCE. The attribution is recorded because it is what the tradition says, not because it holds. 2Tradition: Pythagorean and Neopythagorean number lore Attributed Author / CompilerMrs. L. Dow Balliett, who published the first version of the modern system in 1908 and to whom Dudley devotes a chapter. What later authors added, the pinnacles, the challenges, the cycles, the personal year, is theirs, and this atlas's own numerology-position entries cite four different authors between 1908 and 1965 for what is presented as one system. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Origin of the NamePythagorean numerology is a twentieth-century label. The system it names has no demonstrable descent from Pythagoras, from the Pythagorean societies, or from the ancient arithmological literature; the letter-value chart it rests on was drawn up in the United States after 1900. The name borrows a pedigree, the oldest move in the subject. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceSourced to the subject's own accountIn number theory fifty five is the tenth triangular number, the sum of the integers one through ten, and it is also the tenth Fibonacci number, one, one, two, three, five, eight, thirteen, twenty one, thirty four, fifty five. Both classifications are ordinary mathematical properties rather than anything a tradition has treated as meaningful. It carries no religious or scriptural significance recorded in any tradition this atlas has surveyed. 3 Status
Standing as a Comparative CategoryLargely abandoned as a comparative category 1 Modern Numerology
Reduction in the Modern SystemThe modern system reduces every number above nine by adding its digits: 5 + 5 = 10, then 1 + 0 = 1. Whatever the system says of 55 it therefore says of 1, because it holds no separate doctrine for the higher numbers. The stated exceptions are 11, 22 and 33, which it leaves unreduced and calls master numbers. 1Tradition: Modern name numerology (Mrs. L. Dow Balliett and her successors) Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern UseNumerology has been sold since Balliett as a basis for decisions: which name to take, which date to marry on, which house number to buy. Dudley's survey of what numerologists sell is the standard critical account and its finding is blunt, numbers have power over minds, not over events. These entries record what the tradition says, not advice. 1 Learn More
Triangular and Fibonacci
Fifty-five is five times eleven and reduces to ten and then one. Its interest is chiefly mathematical: it is a triangular number, the sum of the integers one through ten, and it is a term in the Fibonacci sequence, the tenth, following thirty-four and preceding eighty-nine, one of the relatively few numbers that are both, which recreational mathematics notes with pleasure. The doubled five gives it, in numerological reading, an intensified quality of change and freedom before its reduction through ten to the unity of one.
Fifty-five falls outside Cheiro's original 1926 compound-number scheme, which stops at fifty-two, so no reading attributed to his book is reported here; Balliett's 1908 chart reduces it instead to one, by way of ten, initiative and new beginnings in the standard modern keyword list, a root shared with nineteen and thirty-seven and read, in the standard American chart, as the doubled five of change resolving into a single decisive direction. In chemistry, fifty-five is the atomic number of cesium, the element whose atomic vibrations define the modern second: the International System of Units has fixed the second, since 1967, as a specific count of oscillations of the cesium-133 atom, making this number's namesake element the literal basis of precise timekeeping worldwide.
What the Systems Assign
Fifty-five carries no developed religious symbolism; the older traditions did not take it up, and its significance is confined to its arithmetical form and to the reductive readings of modern numerology, where the repeated five is sometimes treated as a heightened call to adventure and the senses. The honest account is a number whose whole interest lies in being at once triangular and Fibonacci, a coincidence of two of the more attractive number sequences, rather than in any body of tradition.
Walter Burkert's study of the Pythagorean tradition would treat fifty-five's status as both a triangular number and a Fibonacci term as a genuine mathematical property rather than a symbolic one, the sort of fact the ancient arithmological writers prized in numbers such as six and twenty-eight but did not, on his account, derive from Pythagoras himself; the coincidence of the two properties in one number is simply arithmetic, not evidence of any deliberate design by either the Fibonacci sequence's medieval discoverer or the ancient triangular-number tradition. The Fibonacci property noted above has a further consequence: the ratio of fifty-five to the Fibonacci number before it, thirty-four, is approximately zero point six one eight, an early approximation of the golden ratio, phi, which the ratio of consecutive Fibonacci numbers approaches ever more closely as the sequence grows.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Disciplines That Use This
The modern numerological system assigns this number a meaning, which is why the atlas records it as a subject in its own right, though this does not endorse what the discipline says about it. This link shows only that the discipline works with this particular number; the readings of the number itself belong to whichever tradition holds them.
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.